User talk:Gareth Beyers

This is Gareth Beyers's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome

Hello, Gareth Beyers, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 11:51, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

September 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. The draft is very promotional and not ready for the encyclopedia. You have a conflict of interest and should not place it in the encyclopedia yourself. It should receive an independent review once the promotional element is remove. The draft should not just summarize routine business activities. 331dot (talk) 16:13, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 17:13, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|reason=I understand it was wrong to delete admin remarks on drafted articles. I was frustrated that every time I make edits it get rejected. I understand that its wrong to make alternative accounts to be able to edit. I would like to work with admins to contribute valuable input to wikipedia. Please unblock me so I can try again to contribute something valuable} Gareth Beyers (talk) 10:00, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This block is per the general sanctions regarding crypto edits that you were notified of per the history of this page. You may be unblocked early if you agree to use the draft submission process due to your conflict of interest. 331dot (talk) 17:17, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 15:06, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Gareth Beyers (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Like I said I understand that it is wrong and would like to be allowed to edit the article. I have already declared my position

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Like I said I understand that it is wrong and would like to be allowed to edit the article. I have already declared my position |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Like I said I understand that it is wrong and would like to be allowed to edit the article. I have already declared my position |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Like I said I understand that it is wrong and would like to be allowed to edit the article. I have already declared my position |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Gareth Beyers (talk) 10:11, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now blocked indefinitely due to your use of another account to evade your block. You will need to start communicating with us to resolve this. 331dot (talk) 15:07, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now socked/meat with User:MamboAfrica. 331dot (talk) 09:17, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gareth Beyers (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand it was wrong to delete admin remarks on drafted articles. I was frustrated that every time I make edits it get rejected. I understand that its wrong to make alternative accounts to be able to edit. I would like to work with admins to contribute valuable input to wikipedia. Please unblock me so I can try again to contribute something valuable

Decline reason:

No. You were just caught evading your block again. You are closer to a community ban than you are to being unblocked. Your best bet is to go six months with zero edits, then apply under WP:SO. At that time, you'll need to address your inappropriate edits, your conflict of interest, and your sockpuppetry. Yamla (talk) 10:04, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{unblock|reason=Like I said I understand that it is wrong and would like to be allowed to edit the article. I have already declared my position.} Gareth Beyers (talk)