User talk:CanadianSingh1469

Welcome!

Welcome, CanadianSingh1469!

Hello, CanadianSingh1469, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages that you might find helpful. If you need interactive assistance please visit The Help desk. You may want to begin by reading these pages:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions. Again, welcome! Sincerely, - SUN EYE 1 17:46, 20 February 2022 (UTC) [reply]

August 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Battle of Samana have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Battle of Samana was changed by CanadianSingh1469 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.875756 on 2021-08-25T04:09:51+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:09, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CanadianSingh1469, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi CanadianSingh1469! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Please stop linking things

Hi - you are linking words that do not need to be linked. Please review WP:OVERLINK. Thanks Girth Summit _(blether) 09:31, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:First Battle of Chamkaur

Hello, CanadianSingh1469. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:First Battle of Chamkaur, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Georgethedragonslayer (talk) 05:32, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading edit summary

Don't revert constructive edits by attacking them as "disruptive" like you did here. Georgethedragonslayer (talk) 05:32, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was disruptive because it removed a lot of information without adequate reasoning. This situation should he discussed in the talk page. CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 06:45, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To add I understand what you mean and I should have worded it better CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 06:50, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you stop providing wrong details about me to others? I provided adequate edit summaries. USSR provided no support to India that you would mention them in infobox. UK is alleged of providing intelligence by a Sikh group. Still it shouldn't be included in infobox even if it was true. Mention of Israel is based on hearsay. Now you need to stop edit warring or you will be blocked. 103.240.204.243 (talk) 07:19, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Look you cannot remove sourced information. Bring it to the talk page. CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 20:24, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can remove garbage backed with using poor sources. 103.240.204.243 (talk) 01:35, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read Wikipedia Content Removal. You need a consensus to removed sourced information. To see of there is a consensus take the situation to the talk page or don’t remove the sourced information. CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 01:37, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are you also going to claim that anybody can insert information like "Khalistan is the best terrorist group" and use one of your fringe Khalistani source, and then you will fight against its removal because "You need a consensus to removed sourced information"? Stop being so dense. 103.240.204.243 (talk) 01:55, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I didn’t put the information in. It has been around for a long time. Please check your talk page. I am trying to resolve this with evidence. We need to work together. Don’t accuse me of being a Khalistani and don’t call me dense. CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 01:58, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Where I said that you are a "khalistani"? Point me out. 103.240.204.243 (talk) 01:59, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]