Talk:Wind turbine
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Wind turbine is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive. | ||||||||||
|
|
|||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
My photo being vandalized?
I read on the edit history that Streamline8988 removed my image of a wind turbine due to "vandalism." What happened? I have not visited this page for a while since I uploaded my own photo but I know it was there for a decent amount of time until its removal.
Tallest Turbine Update Request
After doing some research on wind turbines, I decided to check to see if the Nordex 3.3 MW is still the tallest turbine. It is not anymore. The tallest is now a German-made turbine that is around 247 meters tall(170 meters to the top of the tower.) It was built by the company Max Bögl Wind AG in 2017. - MilesMcintyre
Link to Website: https://ww.electrek.co/2017/11/02/worlds-tallest-wind-turbine-built-in-germany/
Semi-protected edit request on 18 February 2022
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can the following be added to the section Wind turbine#Demolition and recycling:
Used wind turbine blades have been recycled by incorporating them as part of the support structures within pedestrian bridges in Poland[1] and Ireland.[2]
-- 108.71.214.235 (talk) 03:34, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
- Doing now. Since I The Verge uses CompositesWorld when sourcing the Poland bridge it's probably reliable. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:07, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
- Done ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:18, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
References
- ^ Mason, Hannah (October 21, 2021). "Anmet installs first recycled wind turbine blade-based pedestrian bridge". CompositesWorld.
- ^ Stone, Maddie (February 11, 2022). "Engineers are building bridges with recycled wind turbine blades". The Verge.
Technology / Costs
In this section, it should read out “As of 2020, installing a wind turbine may cost around $1.11 million per megawatt of installed capacity.”
This both updates the latest year cited in the source article as well as fixes the incorrect notion that a single megawatt of energy produced costs $1 million. The existing sentence seems to confuse energy production and instantaneous power 71.183.72.35 (talk) 17:02, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change "and, the most favorable" (last sentence of first paragraph of article) to "and . . . the most favourable".
Reason: The ungrammatical comma after "and" is also a misquotation. The quoted source reads, "lowest relative greenhouse gas emissions, the least water consumption demands and with the most favourable social impacts" (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364032108000555). Substituting ellipsis for "with" preserves both grammar and accuracy. 72.95.95.49 (talk) 17:22, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Done Thanks! Of the universe (talk) 17:58, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Efficience to weight ratio
2MW weighs 220Tons of molten metals, 12MW weighs 660 Tonnes, that's a 200% effieciency rise. The 12MW HaliadeX can melt 660 tons of metal in 8 days. Over its 8000 day (25yr) lifetime, it can make 1000 other turbines of green steel. If the base is reused 50 to 100 years, that efficience can quadruple. 2A02:8440:531A:1425:B9FD:1AF8:1EFE:4D10 (talk) 05:40, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Wind turbine
- WikiProject templates with unknown parameters
- B-Class Mills articles
- High-importance Mills articles
- C-Class Environment articles
- Mid-importance Environment articles
- C-Class energy articles
- Mid-importance energy articles
- C-Class physics articles
- Low-importance physics articles
- C-Class physics articles of Low-importance
- C-Class fluid dynamics articles
- Fluid dynamics articles
- C-Class Technology articles
- WikiProject Technology articles
- Wikipedia articles that use American English