Jump to content

User talk:AnnaKalota1982

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AnnaKalota1982 (talk | contribs) at 16:45, 27 October 2022 (October 2022: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

October 2022

Information icon

Hello AnnaKalota1982. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Cormac Kilty, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:AnnaKalota1982. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=AnnaKalota1982|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Netherzone (talk) 14:15, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:AnnaKalota1982, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=AnnaKalota1982|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. You are required to communicate. What is your affiliation with UCD? Netherzone (talk) 14:06, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
See below. Is that all you need?
Thanks
Anna AnnaKalota1982 (talk) 16:45, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Draft:John Bell, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 15:39, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Carey (October 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 10:44, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, AnnaKalota1982! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 10:44, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sinead Walsh has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sinead Walsh. Thanks! Eternal Shadow Talk 02:54, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Olivia Maguire (October 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jamiebuba (talk) 14:03, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr Patrick Bradley (October 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pbrks were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
– Pbrks (t • c) 15:21, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Bell (October 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 19:48, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Patricia Scanlan has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Patricia Scanlan. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:10, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Decawave (company) (October 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 21:50, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Orlaith Blaney (October 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 21:51, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sinead Walsh (October 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 20:02, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Patricia Scanlan (October 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 16:41, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]