Template:Did you know nominations/Accountability partner

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 19:29, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Accountability partner

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that some evangelical Christians confess their sexual temptations to an accountability partner in order to avoid committing sin? Source: Diefendorf, Sarah (2015). "After the Wedding Night: Sexual Abstinence and Masculinities over the Life Course". Gender & Society. 29 (5): 647-669. doi:10.1177/0891243215591597.; Bartkowski, John P. (2000). "Breaking Walls, Raising Fences: Masculinity, Intimacy, and Accountability among the Promise Keepers". Sociology of Religion. 61 (1): 33–53. doi:10.2307/3712089. ISSN 1069-4404.
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Regensburg Botanical Society
  • Comment: This is my fifth DYK nomination, so I think I am exempt from QPQ (though I will try to do one anyway if I can). I saved this from AfD; expansion began on 27 September with this edit by Ficaia; before that, this was the state of the article pre-expansion.

5x expanded by WJ94 (talk). Self-nominated at 12:20, 4 October 2022 (UTC).

• @WJ94: Actually, as this is your fifth nomination, you are required to do a QPQ. From WP:DYK: If you have previously nominated fewer than five articles (whether self-nominated or otherwise), no QPQ is required. The QPQ requirement kicks in starting with your fifth nomination. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 14:27, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

• @Narutolovehinata5: Thanks for your reply. It does seem from the wording you quoted that I would be exempt from QPQ: when I made this nomination, I had previously nominated fewer than five articles (i.e., 4). I will try to do a review in the next couple of days nonetheless. WJ94 (talk) 09:20, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• I have now reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Regensburg Botanical Society. WJ94 (talk) 15:07, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

• New enough, long enough, neutral in wikivoice and I could not detect any too-close paraphrasing. Accessed the source through the Wikipedia Library, hook fact mostly checks out, but the Wikipedia article does not mention "sin" by name—only by allusion through the sexual purity stuff. Once changed, I can approve @WJ94:. DigitalIceAge (talk) 17:23, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

• @DigitalIceAge: Thanks for your review. How about the following alternative hook?

ALT1: ... that some evangelical Christians confess their sexual temptations to an accountability partner in order to maintain their sexual purity?

WJ94 (talk) 14:57, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Better. Approve ALT1. DigitalIceAge (talk) 17:14, 27 October 2022 (UTC)