User talk:Arjayay

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5	Archive 6
Archive 7	Archive 8	Archive 9
Archive 10	Archive 11	Archive 12
Archive 13	Archive 14	Archive 15
Archive 16	Archive 17	Archive 18
Archive 19	Archive 20	Archive 21
Archive 22	Archive 23	Archive 24
Archive 25	Archive 26	Archive 27
Archive 28	Archive 29	Archive 30
Archive 31	Archive 32	Archive 33
Archive 34

This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

E-mails

You can use "Email this user", but I will probably reply on your talk page, or the article talk page, as discussions should be open and on the record.
I have experienced problems with e-mails not being delivered, so please leave me a message on this page if I have not replied within 48 hours.

Broadcasted

The Wiktionary definition of Broadcasted states the use is sometimes proscribed, so it should not be used. The word also appears on Wikipedia:Lists_of_common_misspellings/B

Broadcasted appears in some dictionaries, but others, e.g. Chambers state "Sorry, no entries for Broadcasted were found".
Broadcast appears in all dictionaries, and should be used as COMMONALITY - "Wikipedia tries to find words that are common to all varieties of English".

A July 2022 search for Broadcast gave over 227,000 uses, compared with a search for Broadcasted which gave just 93.
Of these, 16 are redirects to "Broadcast" articles, 14 refer to a 2015 Canadian TV award and 5 relate to a 1924 cartoon. The rest are in quotations.

On Michael Billington (critic)

Hi, I had intended to apply the "nonconstructive" edit message to Gaudiumrr, not you. So apologies and happy editing! Skynxnex (talk) 21:35, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries Skynxnex - we all mis-click occasionally - but thanks for the apology - Arjayay (talk) 21:39, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on your longevity. 18:39, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Removal of content without resourch on it

I bet you have not resourched before editing page.As Sambhaji's page itself contains very hypothetical editing which not parallel to real historical sources.now let's come my edit,so you objects that I have deleted references which in your sense is 'valid'.So about that execution statement only John Richard support that statement which put on this page but there are Indian sources says different opinions&also foreign letters says same things as in Indian sources so in that mean we also should put these opinions&sources on page right?so we have to put only neutral point of view that's what I done.i delete that statement itself and simply avoided that topic because this page is not about that. &for that military battle statement,you should resourch because I was already provided sources about it very earlier Prathmesh Bhale (talk) 05:01, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to Ms. NJ Nandini's page

Kindly note that whatever addition made to Ms Nandini's Wikipedia page has been approved by Ms Nandini, herself 116.68.85.227 (talk) 16:40, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to misunderstand Wikipedia and how it works. Wikipedia is not like Facebook or other social media.

Our article N. J. Nandini‎ is not "Ms Nandini's Wikipedia page" but Wikipedia's page about N. J. Nandini‎
We have no interest in what N. J. Nandini‎ wants to appear on that page, the contents will be solely determined by Wikipedia's policies and guidelines
N. J. Nandini‎, or anyone working on her behalf, should not edit that page, as they have a clear Conflict of interest. Please read WP:Conflict of interest for how she, or anyone working on her behalf, can request edits to be made at Talk:N. J. Nandini‎. Such requests must include references to independent reliable sources - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 10:43, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Query

I see you reverted some info put up on the Bokaro Airport page by someone using a suspected sock puppet account. Is that info actually incorrect - I saw it had refs? Styx & Stones (talk) 10:38, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Styx & Stones - as explained in my edit summary it was deleted WP:RBI
This is long term abuse editor that I have been chasing for over 2 years and 89 sock accounts - although I'm sure I must have missed several.
He has a habit of including some false/PoV information in among a mass of good info, so if you want to reuse his references please check them, and put your additions in your own words. Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 11:17, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are a boss at copyediting

You are persistently contributing copyedits. Your work is not unnoticed, and is greatly appreciated. SecretName101 (talk) 17:27, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quetta disruptive edit even after warning

he again edited the same way after you undid it. User Talk:PakistanHistorian Inspite of being warned multiple times against disruptive editing, he keeps on repeating. PakistaniHistorian (talk) 00:01, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

please see and help

hi i want to be a big creator like you please help Tanish Bainad (talk) 13:00, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

KURMI IS Kshatriya caste not sudhr

Sir Kurmi is Vedic Kshatriya caste.. we can see in Satpath Brahmin & Bhargav up puran they have described that KurmibIs kshatriya.. Here is wrong information that Kurmi under Shudr on Wiki. Mahraja Jyotiraditya Scindhia had said that My caste is kurmi & they belongs rajpariwar of gwalior. 2405:204:3409:2D3:0:0:15CE:18A1 (talk) 16:08, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sakshi Maharaj

You reverted my edit here but the content is supported by the existing source. Can you self-revert? 103.250.137.140 (talk) 04:02, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]