Jump to content

User talk:ELSchissel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Wikifiveoh (talk | contribs) at 11:04, 24 November 2022 (This Little Piggy). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hello!

This is actually my second account, but as I managed to lock myself permanently and irretrievably out of my first one, here we go. ELSchissel (talk) 14:42, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ELSchissel, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi ELSchissel! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 8 July 2020 (UTC)


ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrats' noticeboard

There is a debate ongoing regarding whether you should have been desysopped due to the inactivity on your other account at Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard § Wikipedia:Inactive administrators/2021#July 2021. I thought someone should give you this courtesy notification. Sdrqaz (talk) 19:06, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. As I have not been able to log into that account for quite some time due to having lost my 2factor key, I have no objection… ELSchissel (talk) 19:15, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As I understand it, the debate is happening because there are some of the opinion that that account's administrative tools should have been transferred over to this one. Overall, as a person you can be argued to not have been inactive for long enough over the two accounts (this is a good example of a desysop not happening for those reasons). Sdrqaz (talk) 19:20, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The whole point of 2-factor auth and all that is in principle I could be only claiming to be etc ELSchissel (talk) 20:06, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

True, but given the explanation posted by the original administrator account, I think most would probably agree that both accounts are controlled by the same person. Sdrqaz (talk) 20:12, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

yep! ELSchissel (talk) 20:27, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sophie Carmen Eckhardt-Gramatté, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Suite. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you might want to know that I replied to the question you asked on the Talk Page regarding the alleged sinister origins of this child's rhyme game. Many web pages that deal with both Folklore and Fakelore have covered your question before. I tried to summarize it for you. I thank you for asking the question, however, because there has been yet another outbreak of this Meme all over Facebook in the past couple of weeks. Have a great weekend. LiPollis (talk) 17:59, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!! ELSchissel (talk) 00:43, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Hi ELSchissel, you contributed valuably to the Duesenberg page Talk discussion previously. On the same 'use in popular culture' theme, a debate is currently ongoing there. Please see the final 'Etymology/doozy' section in Talk. A user is unilaterally seeking to remove all mention of 'Doozy' in popular culture and its link to the Duesenberg marque. Best regards, Wikifiveoh (talk) 11:03, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]