Jump to content

User talk:Nythar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Nythar. Thank you for creating Zaporizhzhia residential building airstrike. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 19:50, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn: That was a quick review. Thanks! NytharT.C 19:52, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – November 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2022).

Administrator changes

  • added
  • readded
  • removed

Interface administrator changes

CheckUser changes

Oversight changes

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Hello, Nythar,

Please be careful with your deletion tagging. There is nothing promotional about this User page. Editors are allowed to talk about themselves on their User pages without it being labeled advertising. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 04:37, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Liz, I'm sorry, would something like this be considered promotional, then? At what point does a user page become not promotional? — Nythar (💬-🎃) 07:45, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Klete Keller

https://twitter.com/MacFarlaneNews/status/1583400702256111617 is this proof enough for you? 98.211.202.152 (talk) 23:56, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

98.211.202.152, no, Scott MacFarlane is not a reliable source. Please see WP:CITINGSOURCES and add one next to the text you insert. — Nythar (💬-🎃) 23:59, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
really so you think he has been sentenced already? where is your proof and what is his sentence? 98.211.202.152 (talk) 00:02, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
98.211.202.152, I didn't claim that. I'm simply asking you to cite a reliable source to support the claim that he has a hearing due on January 20 next year. Twitter is not considered a reliable source for such information. — Nythar (💬-🎃) 00:07, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
is that your opinion? - that an official account with a blue check-mark on twitter is not a reliable source? 98.211.202.152 (talk) 00:14, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
98.211.202.152, please read WP:TWITTER. Twitter is sometimes used to cite a person's statements if they made that statement on their official Twitter account, but it can't be used as a reference for this claim. (BTW, the blue check mark isn't as valuable as it once was.) — Nythar (💬-🎃) 00:20, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On restoration

This may explain it. It's from the Geraldine Ulmar featured picture, and it's a gif so it doesn't look as good as the original, but it gives an idea of what I did.


Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.2% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600th FP! 08:46, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Cuerden, that is very careful editing. Do you use a software tool or is it manual? — Nythar (💬-🎃) 08:52, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I use GIMP, and it's largely manual (I use the healing brush, which tone-matches to the background a bit) Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.2% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600th FP! 08:53, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'll probably be checking that one out. I usually find these things quite interesting. Thanks for explaining! — Nythar (💬-🎃) 09:04, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No worries! If you need help, I could probably set aside a day to walk you through how to use it in a screenshare call, though might be a little bit. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.2% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600th FP! 09:09, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm asking you if my IP is being tracked and my edits are being automatically reverted.

Like, why is it doing that? - 2603:7081:3800:126:DDB6:5B53:629A:CCF (talk) 13:22, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2603:7081:3800:126:DDB6:5B53:629A:CCF, there's a page where all of your edits are visible. Click on your IP address and you'll see all your edits. — Nythar (💬-🎃) 13:23, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
But why are they being reverted once they're made? - 2603:7081:3800:126:DDB6:5B53:629A:CCF (talk) 13:24, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Because you are rapidly disrupting Wikipedia so we started to keep an eye on you. Please stop your disruptive edits or you will be blocked. Timothytyy (talk) 13:25, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
But is this process automatic? 2603:7081:3800:126:DDB6:5B53:629A:CCF (talk) 13:26, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Undoing a disruptive edit is a simple thing as long as we are sure your edits are disruptive. Timothytyy (talk) 13:27, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
But his edits are always the second they are created, no matter if it is or not. - 2603:7081:3800:126:DDB6:5B53:629A:CCF (talk) 13:28, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you look carefully they are made roughly 10 seconds after you disruptive edit. There are thousands of hard-working editors who are fighting against disruptors like you, so don't think that you can vandalize Wikipedia without consequences. Timothytyy (talk) 13:30, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm pretty sure it's a bot doing it, I literally added his age. 2603:7081:3800:126:DDB6:5B53:629A:CCF (talk) 13:31, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You're going through the Special:Log/Page curation log, I can see. All your edits have been to pages on that log. — Nythar (💬-🎃) 13:32, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No, You're using an auto reverter, you r-etarded sl-ut. 2603:7081:3800:126:DDB6:5B53:629A:CCF (talk) 13:33, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
We are patrolling your contributions so we can revert your edit almost instantly after checking. Do not attack other editors, especially ones with good faith. Timothytyy (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The format of your addition of age is incorrect so please check the norms of Wikipedia before editing. Timothytyy (talk) 13:33, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
HIS AGE, IS FU-CKING, 39, YOU FUC-KING RE-TARD! 2603:7081:3800:126:DDB6:5B53:629A:CCF (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please check the norms of Wikipedia; there are specific formats for the addition of age. Don't create formats by yourself, especially after frequently vandalizing Wikipedia. Timothytyy (talk) 13:36, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
┌───────────────────────────┘
Calm down. It shouldn't be there. — Nythar (💬-🎃) 13:34, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It, SHOULD. Your bot is just re-tarded! 2603:7081:3800:126:DDB6:5B53:629A:CCF (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am not using a bot. I'm using WP:TWINKLE. I'd appreciate it if an admin could solve this for me, though. — Nythar (💬-🎃) 13:36, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Bruh, why did edit go byebye? 2603:7081:3800:126:DDB6:5B53:629A:CCF (talk) 13:37, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Nythar The admins are sleeping. They don't block this uncontrollable IP even after his vandalism and attacks. Timothytyy (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No, there is many admins, but they are re-tarded because they use the DROP-DOWN BARS. 2603:7081:3800:126:DDB6:5B53:629A:CCF (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Timothytyy, they do, just be patient and ignore disruptive users. See WP:DENY. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. This user has temporarily stopped vandalizing Wikipedia. Timothytyy (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Why is so many people here now?!? Am I famous on Wikipedia?!? Well I am a Fandom vandalizer on Wikitubia. 2603:7081:3800:126:DDB6:5B53:629A:CCF (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]