User talk:Mxhyn16

Welcome!

Hello, Mxhyn16, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! GPL93 (talk) 21:22, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Whiteguru. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Whiteguru (talk) 20:12, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Legacies (TV series), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. — YoungForever^(talk) 01:21, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jerry Bruckheimer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gemini Man. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Trauma (I Prevail album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, you may be blocked from editing. The AllMusic genre could is not a reliable source for genres and should never be used. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:51, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You continue to make the same changes, and do so without explanation. Both need to stop. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:35, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I know I'm sorry about. It's just it kinda feels weird to separate the genres by using commas. I feel like putting in flatlist just makes it more suitable. I hope you understand. Please don't block me. I just want to improve something. Mxhyn16 (talk) 06:38, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't block you if I tried. Lists are lists, and comma are commas. Feel free to read the documentation at {{Infobox musical artist}}. Long unformatted lists are beneficial for those who use screen readers, but too many people treat them as decoration, which they aught not to be. The rest of your work is good though! Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:40, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So you know

I’ve put in a protection request for Scream 2022. Had a feeling the vandalism would increase. Sure there were registered users restoring the unverified summary, but especially since it’s now multiple IPs, it felt right--CreecregofLife (talk) 06:32, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question

You just made a series of ≈20 consecutive edits to Halo (TV series), starting with the addition of ≈40,000 bytes of content, which was then whittled down to -4 bytes, and a visible difference of minor changes to four words. You didn't leave any edit summaries, nor is there any comments from you on the article talk page that would explain this unusual editing. It would be helpful to do so in the future. Also, instead of blowing up the page history, and all the watchpages of editors monitoring this page, could I suggest that in the future that you use the preview function to make changes while limiting the number of actual edits, or work on the content in your User:Mxhyn16/sandbox, then transfer the finalized version to the article with a single edit. Please keep these suggestions in mind going forward, thank you. - wolf 07:23, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was trying to fix the page because it wasn't constructive. So I copy and paste the last page for a manual revert. But I accidentally double up the page. I didn't even notice because I thought it didn't work. I was using my phone to fix the page. Using a computer would've been easier, but I had use my phone because it was getting late. I'm sorry about that. Hope you understand. Thank you Mxhyn16 (talk) 17:17, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a particular reason why the edit was deemed "Completely unnecessary" to the point of reverting everything? I am using guidelines to help expand the "Reception" part of the article, and I am citing a variety of different sources ensure that the article is well versed, instead of being pulled out of no where; plus as per Snowmanonahoe "at least provide a source(s)" which I have been. Reception to a show is important to any wiki page on media, such a movie or tv show, and just leaving it "oh it's all positive" without putting in any level and counterbalance of "but there are some criticisms" is biased. Whatever concerns and criticism fans may have with the show, I am not using fan reaction on social media but actual critic and other publisher articles to add to the point. Literally on a section in a TV article about Reception, deleting sourced criticism and only leaving in the "it's all good man, nothing to see here but positivieity and rainbows" is counterproductive, biased, and not servicing the article nor the world of media and associated praise and criticism. Mxhyn16 [[User:Duyneuzaenasagae|Duyneuzaenasagae] — Preceding undated comment added 16:35, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Using someone else's tweet as a BLP source

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:54, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Please assume good faith and do not use offensive language towards other editors like you did [1]. LancedSoul (talk) 19:54, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I totally understand. I know I'm not supposed to offensive language toward other editors. It's just I can't do everything myself. Someone has to do it.