User talk:Hypotherical

Welcome!

Hello Hypotherical! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 12:32, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

December 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Children's Miracle Network Hospitals has been reverted.
Your edit here to Children's Miracle Network Hospitals was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/c/dingercity) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:32, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ENGVAR

Hi – I apologise for having to revert a lot of your edits, but I have to inform you of Wikipedia's policy on English varieties.

Whatever variety of English is in use on an article (such as British English or American English), it generally shouldn't be changed, unless there is a very good reason for it – such as the subject matter being about something American, for instance.

English varieties and their use on Wikipedia can get contentious at times, so to avoid edit warring, Wikipedia's WP:ENGVAR policy must be respected. No one variety of English is considered to be "bad grammar" on Wikipedia, so varieties aren't changed for that reason.

It is true that an article can have an unclear English style, and sometimes editors will unify its English style based on if it's relevant to the article's subject matter and if one variety is more commonly represented in the article than another. Nevertheless – it's best to leave well-established English varieties on an article alone.

I hope this helps, and happy editing!—Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) ({{ping}} me!) 12:38, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ineffablebookkeeper Alright, I'll be sure to know. Hypotherical (talk) 12:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]