Talk:Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Semi-protected edit request on 23 June 2020
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Number of units passed 400, not 200+ (source: https://www.aerospacemanufacturinganddesign.com/article/bell-boeing-delivers-400th-v-22-osprey/ as of June 22 2020) 155.201.42.25 (talk) 00:22, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Done! GoingBatty (talk) 00:45, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks to you both! -Fnlayson (talk) 00:46, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Semi-Protected Edit Request 28 June 2020
21st Special Operations Squadron began flying CV-22's out of Yokota as of July 1 2019[1]. List of Air Force Squadrons should be updated in Operators.
References
Semi-protected edit request on 19 March 2022
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
there has been another accident, so its 13 now. the specific page Accidents and incidents involving the V-22 Osprey has already been updated, this page not.--91.64.59.86 (talk) 13:38, 19 March 2022 (UTC) 91.64.59.86 (talk) 13:38, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Already done Happy Editing--IAmChaos 00:07, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
More accurate detail
Under Variant/CV-22B/last line Change: The CV-22 replaced the MH-53 Pave Low. To: The CV-22B replaced the MH-53 Pave Low. 2603:7081:3E07:782B:7989:A821:55C7:21C5 (talk) 02:05, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 9 December 2022
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
It is written that: "Because of the requirement for folding rotors, their 38-foot (11.6 m) diameter is 5 feet (1.5 m) less than optimal for vertical takeoff, resulting in high disk loading.[105]"
Unfortunately that source [105] nowhere states that. And also by an engineering point of view that claim doesn't make any sense: there's no universal "optimal" disk loading, each rotorcraft has its own optimal disk loading according to its mission. 95.91.254.251 (talk) 21:50, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
- Not done The source states "the Osprey’s rotors are 38 feet in diameter — about five feet less than would have been optimum for an aircraft designed to carry 24 Marines and take off vertically at a maximum gross weight of 52,600 lbs., according to engineers who helped design it." Loafiewa (talk) 22:02, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 10 December 2022
It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".
The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |
Regarding my edit request of the 9th December:
firstly, oops sorry I really didn't see that sentence; secondly, can then please the full sentence be copied over i.e. with the "in respect to an aircraft designed to carry 24 Marines and take off vertically at a maximum gross weight of 52,600 lbs". A comparison without a term of comparison doesn't make much sense.
Thanks 2A02:3033:408:5169:758B:75BD:3879:E7BA (talk) 09:34, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Engineering and technology good articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- GA-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- GA-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- GA-Class aviation articles
- GA-Class rotorcraft articles
- Rotorcraft task force articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests
- Wikipedia edit requests possibly using incorrect templates