Jump to content

User talk:JPxG/Archive22

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ClueBot III (talk | contribs) at 07:08, 13 December 2022 (Archiving 2 discussions from User talk:JPxG. (BOT)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


"‎ Replace redirected template (Template:Pageviews -> Template:Annual readership)"

Why? normally redirects aren't bypassed * Pppery * it has begun... 04:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Pppery: I was going to put an extremely simple template together at the title of the redirect, so I retargeted the incoming links. Upon trying to write my extremely simple template I have discovered that I am probably separated from it by a few dozen hours of learning Lua. So it goes, I suppose. jp×g 05:06, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And this is why we sandbox first ;-) Primefac (talk) 12:03, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost pages are now categorised by status

It's actually really trivial because we already sort them, just needed to add something to put them into categories. https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Template%3ASignpost_draft&type=revision&diff=1120601155&oldid=1120432276 There. Change the category names to whatever you want. D'ye want any other statuses? It currently sorts them as either Category:Wikipedia Signpost articles not yet ready for copyediting, Category:Wikipedia Signpost articles ready for copyediting, or Category:Wikipedia Signpost articles that have been copyedited. I've filtered the first of those categories to only include - well, it's technical how I did it, but basically it checks for "Next issue" in the page name, which removes a bunch of sandbox articles, templates, and long-dead article drafts from old incarnations of the Newsroom.

I haven't made the category pages yet, as there's not much point until they're renamed how you want. MAKE SURE to include {{Possibly empty category}} in the category pages or expect them to be deleted.

Sometimes I forget that I'm one of the only Wikipedians old enough to remember how to do these things. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.2% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600th FP! 21:18, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, by the way, if something has a template that gets filled out to show status or to do something, it can probably be categorised by that status using similar techniques to this. Just need to put the desired category into the right "if" (or "yesno" in this case). Also useful for statistics. If, for example, you wanted to know if people were using the fullwidth=yes option, well, you could just add a temporary category (wouldn't even need to make the page for that category, really), give it a couple days to transclude to everything, get the numbers, and then delete the code putting it into the category Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.2% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600th FP! 02:45, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-45

MediaWiki message delivery 00:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've copyedited it, standardised its page name (Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Next issue/Legal certainty) and added it to the list. We could probably put it in as "Opinion", but I'd say that's your call.

In other news, you might want to take a glance at the Essay I wrote, and see if you want it elsewhere (I'd have preferred to do that one as an interview, but, well - did you know I'm the only Wikicup winner never to have their win mentioned in the Signpost? Didn't want to miss this achievement too, and writing it is way easier than complaining about it until someone acts.

I saw some commentary on the Newsroom talk page that someone else has an essay they want to run. If you want to move it to another section, feel free. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.2% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600th FP! 04:14, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions review: proposed decision and community review

You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to updates on the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions review process. The Proposed Decision phase of the discretionary sanctions review process has now opened. A five-day public review period for the proposed decision, before arbitrators cast votes on the proposed decision, is open through November 18. Any interested editors are invited to comment on the proposed decision talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:56, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-46

MediaWiki message delivery 21:53, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:32, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 53

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 53, September – October 2022

  • New collections:
    • Edward Elgar
    • E-Yearbook
    • Corriere della Serra
    • Wikilala
  • Collections moved to Library Bundle:
    • Ancestry
  • New feature: Outage notification
  • Spotlight: Collections indexed in EDS

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-47

MediaWiki message delivery 23:19, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

News item about Wikipedia

If you haven't already seen it, here's an article for mention in the Signpost titled "No, Wikipedia is not colluding with DHS." DHS is the Department of Homeland Security in the U.S. [6]Smallchief (talk) 22:02, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hope for RfA

I hope that you will make your RfA (Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/JPxG) go live soon. It has almost been a month since your last edit to the RfA, and the RfA comments here have already been archived to Archive21. Well, good luck when the RfA gets transcluded! Are you so busy that you forgot to transclude the RfA and follow the red instructions at the RfA? GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:57, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Before you transclude it, make sure to change "co-EiC" to "EiC" :) 🥒 EpicPickle (they/them | talk) 05:06, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ANOTHER RfA? Well, I hope the RfA goes live soon. It's been a month since the last RfA had been succeeded, and well wishes for the same result. Sarrail (talk) 15:10, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost

See Wikipedia_talk:Wikipedia_Signpost/Newsroom#Copyediting_notes, because I'm worried about keeping both updated
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

I think the following articles are highly unlikely to change, so can be looked over and approved any time you're ready:

Articles that are mostly ready are:

Unstarted articles:

Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.2% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600th FP! 20:11, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am on vacation and, regrettably, do not possess a computer capable of editing worth a damn. I had thought that maybe I would be able to edit worth a damn on my phone, but this was delusional thinking on my part -- I expect to be home either tomorrow or the day after, at which point I can sprint through all of this stuff at the last minute... jp×g 23:17, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, if it makes it easier, and someone else can help me (like, do a third to half) with Featured Content - by far the biggest Signpost timesink for me - I'm happy to help with whatever's needed. Just if FC goes badly, I can't do anything else that month. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.2% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600th FP! 04:41, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost Recent Research

This appears to be our bottleneck this month. I'd say wait on it, but you're EiC. It does feel weird to publish something that's supposedly the same as another newsletter without much of the content. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.2% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600th FP! 20:58, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Title change

Any reason for the title change? I rather liked mine and now my reference is gone... Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 04:22, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I usually redo titles for publication but I can put this one back to what it was. I suspect that the brackets may pose some software issue later on, but whatever. jp×g 05:28, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 November 2022

Tech News: 2022-48

MediaWiki message delivery 20:01, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you know, the blurb is in the vague style of Zork, one of the new featured articles. Title references the two lead images. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.2% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600th FP! 05:45, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, this version works. There aren't any lint errors. —Bruce1eetalk 00:54, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]