User talk:Zero76

I have a big mouth. That's why I chose to join Wikipedia.

Please post any comments you have below. Thanks. Zero76 03:32, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And what's more, sign your name below with four tildes (~) so I know who's trying to say what.

Personal details

Just to say who I am...

Name: Zero76 (anonymous)

DOB: January 13, 1994

Nationality: Chinese

Residence: Hong Kong, China

Likes: Rap, skydiving, hang-gliding, windsurfing, wakeboarding, making noise, speaking weird languages (including gibberish), high speed, complaining (which I'm about to do in the next paragraph), vacation, doing nothing

Dislikes: Telephones, war, Eminem, loud people on cell phones, violence, drugs, arrogance, ignorance, the White House's belief that they can rule the world, pollution, George W. Bush, dirty bathrooms, bad food, and a whole lot I can't think of yet...

Zero76 11:01, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

KGV

Please see WP:NPOV - Plau 15:49, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stereotypes get you nowhere

Your statement of "USA's belief that they can rule the world" is a grand stereotype (and an incorrect one at that) Now, I understand that you are thirteen, and still a young teenager, but you have to understand that in ANY scenario, grouping an entire group of people (especially a nation) will ALWAYS turn out wrong. There is not one stereotype in this world that is 100% genuinely and fully correct. And yes, this is coming from an American. It isn't a "belief", and the grand majority of American's don't believe that. Now, i'm not saying that EVERYONE doesn't believe that, because i'm sure that there are people who are American that believe that America can rule the world. I'm just saying that all stereotypes are wrong, of any sort. OdinReborn 20:14, 18 January 2007 (UTC)OdinReborn[reply]

Alright, I've changed that sentence to "The White House's belief that they can rule the world" which is what I meant in the first place. Sorry for any confusion or misinterpretation. This new sentence is not a stereotype: What is George W. Bush doing in Iraq? - Zero76 11:00, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To make a long story short, he basically made a nation address (Called the State of the Union Address) on January 10, 2007 explaining that his previous course of actions weren't working, taking responsibility for the mistakes, and has carefully talked over the next plan etc etc. His plan now is to send 20,000 (Plus 4,000 outside Baghdad and several Iraq brigades) troops into Baghdad to secure it by placing them in the 9 different districts (Like spokes on a wheel) along with help from I think nine different nations. What he's trying to do is get Iraq on its feet and making sure that it can support itself on its own. If the United States were to pull out of Baghdad, then there would be even more destruction etc because the Al-Qaeda etc etc would move in. He said that Iraq would be spending $10 billion of its own money for repairs etc etc.

Also, you must understand that the White House isn't trying to take over the world. You have to understand that there are two sides different parties in our government - The Democrats and Republicans. Each have their own views. Essentially in a nutshell, Democrats are all about giving back to the people, and not worrying about big businesses, while the Republicans are all about big business, and not worrying about the people. Of course, those are extreme views, of course both Democrats and Republicans do both. George W. Bush is a Republican (If you didn't know already lol) and every four years, we elect a new President into office in November (They don't actually take office until January) The majority of America doesn't agree with the past plans of George Bush (I believe his approval rating is about 24% or so, which is probably one of the lowest approval ratings we've ever had for a President)

Essentially, Republicans want to secure Baghdad and try to make it more democratic (NOT full-fledge American democracy, which is what most people of the world think, but just basic principles and such; we aren't trying to "Americanize" Iraq.) while the Democrats want to pull out immediately and let Iraq do what it wants.

Heh, I know I said that it would be short, but I guess it wasn't =P OdinReborn 17:25, 19 January 2007 (UTC)OdinReborn[reply]

Oh, and besides which, if the President was really overstepping his boundaries, we could impeach (Impeach means to bring charges against) him and remove him from office. OdinReborn 18:16, 19 January 2007 (UTC)OdinReborn[reply]

Well yeah, I know that but then why does Bush want Iraq in the first place? To get his place in the oil industry back by making oil cheap and reliable again. THAT is taking over the world. Think of all the uses of oil. Transport, plastics, pesticides, drugs, etc. THAT is what he wants, not democracy. You can't achieve democracy with war, anyway. It's just chalk and cheese.

And about Al-Qaeda, if he was really that worried he shouldn't have gone into Iraq and Afghanistan in the first place. He's already admitted that the "Weapons of Mass Destruction" alibi was wrong. But bear in mind the terrorists in 9/11 were mainly Saudi, so why didn't he invade Saudi Arabia? Didn't want to break his faith to King Fahd? What the Iraqis want now is to break free from the Americans and live on their own. THAT is what Iraq wants. That's why we hear so much about car bombs and suicide attacks in Iraq these days. Sending 20,000 more troops into Iraq's only going to prolong the chaos.

About the $10 billion? Well, we're onto about $50 billion A MONTH here. The cost of the whole war? About $2 trillion is what economists like Joseph Stiglitz say. The casualties, American and Iraqi, are so high that we've already lost count.

And the impeaching? We should have had that long ago. Bush is breaking his own laws of human rights by invading Iraq. Sometimes following Dad doesn't work. Especially when you don't have a good excuse. It's not really that long a story. Zero76 04:01, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you from KGV?

Hi, are you from KGV? KGV 13:41, 8 February 2007 (UTC)Yes I know, such a lame name for a user, but ah well.[reply]

Yes I am. I am in 8V, you?KGV 08:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in 8P. Who are you anyway? Zero76 11:09, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The name is Robert, you?KGV 02:54, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah like I guessed... you definitely know me I'm in your math class... Zero76 09:58, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You sure? Are you in my chinese class as well? KGV 10:56, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nah I don't take Chinese... Zero76 07:47, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you in my french class? KGV 04:39, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nope... can you guess who I am? Zero76 09:39, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think so. YOU are Ming Chung Tang. KGV 04:28, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice one you're right... how did you get that so easily? (by the way my middle name doesn't have a G so it's Chun not Chung) Zero76 09:46, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, since you don't take chinese you must be in German, and the only 8P student in german that is in set 1 maths is you. KGV 11:07, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

King George V School

Yo should we add the "teaching staff" section back on to the article King George V School? Zero76 10:01, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I guess. Ill do it now. KGV 10:41, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

isnt it obvious its me i mean look at my name u can set up the letters to make ARRIGO TSE