User talk:Blueginger2

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Russian frigate Admiral Gorshkov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mil. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do not edit other editors' talk page posts

I'm going to assume that this was an honest mistake of some sort. Please read WP:TPO. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:58, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

you were correct. i somehow failed to notice the super-obvious reference to bbc... somehow. · · · Omnissiahs hierophant (talk) 20:54, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I think BBC can be trusted here. Hopefully we'll get official or semiofficial specifications of Poseidon someday (I know how unrealistic this is). Blueginger2 (talk) 09:51, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments. Anomie ⚔ 19:48, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Blueginger2. Thank you for your work on Russian submarine Generalissimus Suvorov. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:19, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting of estimated dates

Hi! I have asked WP:SHIPS advice for the formatting of planned/estimated dates. Feel free to participate in the discussion on the project talk page. Tupsumato (talk) 06:31, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Rsk6400 (talk) 06:27, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Prolog. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Odesa, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Prolog (talk) 12:13, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Blueginger2 reported by User:Rsk6400 (Result: ). Thank you. Rsk6400 (talk) 13:33, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:53, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:54, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting edits to your user pages?

Hi there! I see you reverted many edits made by BattyBot to your user pages to change article categories to category links per WP:USERNOCAT. Could you please help me understand why you restored the article categories? Would you prefer to use an alternate method to make sure your user pages are not improperly categorized, such as using {{Draft categories}} or <nowiki>...</nowiki> or ? Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 20:26, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can't help you. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blueginger2 (talk • contribs) 21:47, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure you can help with the first question, so I'll rephrase it. Why did you revert my bot's edits? Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 05:46, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Blueginger2/864vx653s1 35.uo3kzijutzhtdg4683152

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:Blueginger2/864vx653s1 35.uo3kzijutzhtdg4683152, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. jp×g 06:24, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]