Jump to content

Talk:One of the Boys

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 156.204.45.1 (talk) at 06:08, 10 January 2023 (→One of the Boys: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on One of the Boys (Katy Perry album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:24, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on One of the Boys (Katy Perry album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:13, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One of the Boys has sold 7 million copies worldwide according to MTV

"For Perry, the debut would easily best the chart arrival of her breakthrough 2008 effort One of the Boys, which debuted on the charts and peaked at #9 with 47,000 sales; it went on to sell more than one million copies in the U.S. and seven million worldwide. Perry is looking to both beat the sophomore slump and cement her status as one of the world’s pop icons." - MTV (Source: http://www.mtv.com/news/1646527/katy-perry-fantasia-look-to-unseat-eminem-on-charts/) Just read the article if it's reliable (I'm sure of that), can you upgrade 'One of the Boys' worldwide sales? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShaneFilaner (talk • contribs) 10:00, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Done while The Independent (which was used before your comment) is quite viable, this link is even better since it specifically says worldwide, plus MTV specializes in music-related news. Snuggums (talk / edits) 14:26, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on One of the Boys (Katy Perry album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:30, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on One of the Boys (Katy Perry album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:36, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:51, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 14 April 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved -- JHunterJ (talk) 17:11, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

– Gets far more views than all the others combined.[1] Unreal7 (talk) 15:14, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support when easily the most viewed topic, I think it's pretty clear that people look for this album above all else when searching for the term. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 20:28, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose page views aren't everything - the combined long-term significance of the other entries should hold weight compared to a pop album. Keeping all disambiguated avoids problems with someone incorrectly linking to this album at primary when they mean to link to one of the many alternatives. I see no particular benefit, and several downsides, with this move. -- Netoholic @ 05:32, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's been 12 years. Unreal7 (talk) 09:25, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And other entries have been around longer. -- Netoholic @ 14:54, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Entry age is irrelevant; being around longer doesn't necessarily mean something will end up being more prominent in the long run. I realize the same can be said for more recent releases, but none of the others seem to be nearly as prominent as this. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 15:12, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Rather than try to calculate and argue about the totally subjective value of "more prominent" (not a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC criteria), let's at least say there are certainly multiple topics here using this title have long-term significance. This is justification enough to keep them disambiguated for clarity, as readers can already quite easily find the individual articles they are searching for. Moving this one to primary does not help that one bit... and in fact due to mislinks caused by it being at primary, could actually slow down readers. There is no discernible benefit to this move, and potential downside, so its best we don't. -- Netoholic @ 19:39, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In case it wasn't already clear, I was using "more prominent" as another way to say having more long-term significance, and I fail to see how the other topics have much (if any) of that compared to this. Also, it's the main thing that comes up in Google search, and had much more chart success than either of the other albums of the same name. Outside of music, the only subjects that even warrant articles were a couple of short-lived TV shows. How is all of that combined with page views vastly outnumbering all else not sufficient evidence of being a primary topic? SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:28, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
With respects, your user page indicates that you have a very strong interest in music and celebrity topics, with a specific interest and specialization in Katy Perry. I think your personal interest in this topic area seems to be taking priority over a fair evaluation of the other topics - by downplaying their significance and inflating that of Perry's album. Personal bias is extremely hard to avoid, and in this case, I have no such strong interest in any of these topics, so I feel like my vote reflect a decently impartial view. -- Netoholic @ 01:51, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
My interests are irrelevant to whether something is or isn't a primary topic. I know better than to use personal taste as a criteria or to let it skew my judgement. Regardless of whether you believe me, I can assure you that I wasn't trying to downplay/inflate anything. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 02:23, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If moved, the redirects One of the Boys (album) and One of the Boys (song) should be targeted at the Katy Perry article. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:19, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. When all are pop culture items, it's easy - just go with the supermajority, no need to argue about subjective long-term significance. This album was released in 2008 so there's no WP:RECENTISM bias; it has led the pageviews for a long time. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:43, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

One of the Boys

Ahmed@farouk12 156.204.45.1 (talk) 06:08, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:One_of_the_Boys&oldid=1132717844"