Jump to content

Talk:Hawaiian hibiscus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Wasp32 (talk | contribs) at 07:57, 12 January 2023 (Why do the scientific names redirect here?: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Caps

has it that species names on Wikipedia are to be capitalized; warrants a move of this page to Hawaiian Hibiscus as opposed to Hawaiian hibiscus (lowercase h) --James Easton 00:20, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Have no problem myself with that suggestion; however Hibiscus (a genus) and hibiscus (a common name for plants in Hibiscus and perhaps related genera with similar flowers) are really different words and this article is intended to cover the latter. - Marshman 00:33, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
ARRGGHH!!! Common names of birds are capitalized, because the Audubon Society decided to do so and maintains a list of "official common names", to avoid the problem of changes in scientific names. Sometimes common names of other vertebrates are capitalized, but usually not. Names of plants and other animals should NEVER, EVER be capitalized (unless it includes a proper name, like "Hawaiian", obviously). KarlM 09:04, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This. — LlywelynII 02:17, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okina

should of course be used in writing Hawaiian text, which should be wrapped in haw {{lang}} tags. It (of course) should never be used for the common English placenames Hawaii, Oahu, &c. in English-language text. If you have a "colonial oppression" issue with that, kindly take it to Talk:Hawaii, Talk:Oahu, &c. and get those pages moved first. They weren't very interested last time around, but it's been a few years. — LlywelynII 02:17, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hawaiian hibiscus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:43, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why do the scientific names redirect here?

Shouldn't each scientific name have its own article? Propose to break this article up and move each section to its own article titled with the scientific name. Wasp32 (talk) 07:57, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]