Jump to content

User talk:Maduant

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MBlaze Lightning (talk | contribs) at 09:24, 30 January 2023 (General note: Introducing factual errors on Hindenburg Research.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome

Hello, M4DU7, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! DBigXrayᗙ Happy Holidays! 10:23, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

My Talk Page

Ways to improve Sanjana Anand

Hello, M4DU7,

Thank you for creating Sanjana Anand.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for your new article on Sanjana Anand. I recommend expanding the text with quotations from any professional reviews that discussed her performances.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:39, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind message and suggestion. I will work on it soon. M4DU7 (talk) 19:34, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

El_C 16:03, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kotigobba 3 (February 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiAviator was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
WikiAviator (talk) 11:23, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, M4DU7! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiAviator (talk) 11:23, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for North East Delhi riots

On 26 February 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article North East Delhi riots, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. --⋙–DBigXrayᗙ 10:47, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Would not have been possible without your helping hand to update this.--⋙–DBigXrayᗙ 10:47, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

 A glass of Thandai for you
Here is a glass of Thandai for you. Thandai is a traditional Indian cold drink prepared with a mixture of almonds, fennel seeds, watermelon kernels, rose petals, pepper, vetiver seeds, cardamom, saffron, milk and sugar.

Thank you for editing 2020 coronavirus pandemic in India. Here is something to recharge you, cheers.

DTM (talk) 06:18, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
For more Indian dishes, visit the Kitchen of WikiProject India.

Thank you DTM. That is a lovely gesture. M4DU7 (talk) 12:03, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Discussion

Hello , You are active user of updating 2020 coronavirus pandemic in India. Can you please share your views on Here , thanks (Mr.Mani Raj Paul (talk) 13:28, 17 March 2020 (UTC))[reply]

DYK for 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Maharashtra

On 16 April 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Maharashtra, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after suspected coronavirus patients in Maharashtra, India, started fleeing hospitals, the government directed officials to stamp the left hand of those quarantined at home using indelible ink? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2020 coronavirus pandemic in Maharashtra. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Maharashtra), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kotigobba 3 (May 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
We generally don't have articles about films which haven't been released yet.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-- RoySmith (talk) 19:17, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User:RoySmith Is this guideline only for non-English-language films? I am seeing a lot of unreleased American films with fewer references than this draft having their own articles like Samaritan (2020 film). M4DU7 (talk) 16:12, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
M4DU7, No, it's a guideline for all films. Unfortunately, it's often ignored, and the fact that we have articles about unreleased American films doesn't change the fact that we shouldn't. WP:CRYSTAL goes into some detail about this. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:17, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

JioMart moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, JioMart, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 11:22, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:DGG How many references would you like the article to have? Every fact in the article is sourced to reliable references. You also mentioned that the article is promotional in your edit summary. Can you let me know which sentences are promotional in nature? M4DU7 (talk) 16:16, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The references all apppear to be written on the basis of press releases from the company. DGG ( talk ) 20:36, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Kotigobba 3 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kotigobba 3. Thanks! Sulfurboy (talk) 00:50, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Kotigobba 3 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kotigobba 3. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 00:53, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kotigobba 3 has been accepted

Kotigobba 3, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lapablo (talk) 08:27, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:COVID-19 testing by country subdivision

Hi, I noticed you made the initial edits for Indian states in the Template:COVID-19 testing by country subdivision. Can you tell me, which population source you referenced for the table? I'm adding states and making improvements for it here User:Timbaaa/sandbox/3. I am looking to use the same population source for other states too.- Timbaa -> ping me 16:35, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I used the population figures from the respective state Wikipedia articles. Some of them may be from the 2011 census though. M4DU7 (talk) 01:59, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
M4DU7, Thank you - Timbaa -> ping me 10:37, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Chiranjeevi Sarja

On 11 June 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Chiranjeevi Sarja, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 03:05, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Relaxo has been accepted

Relaxo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jeromeenriquez (talk) 19:28, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stovekraft has been accepted

Stovekraft, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Passengerpigeon (talk) 07:04, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dhruv Rathee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dhruv Rathee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhruv Rathee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 09:41, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rebel Foods has been accepted

Rebel Foods, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

--TheImaCow (talk • contribs) 19:25, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Subex has been accepted

Subex, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dee03 04:01, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rebel Foods has been accepted

Rebel Foods, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~ Destroyeraa🌀 15:37, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dixon Technologies has been accepted

Dixon Technologies, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Amkgp 💬 10:16, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khadim's has been accepted

Khadim's, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Amkgp 💬 10:20, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: KRBL (company) (December 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hatchens were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hatchens (talk) 03:02, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rebel Foods for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rebel Foods is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebel Foods until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hatchens (talk) 03:08, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zydus Wellness for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zydus Wellness is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zydus Wellness until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hatchens (talk) 03:21, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:KRBL (company)

Information icon Hello, M4DU7. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:KRBL (company), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 777 Charlie (May 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
As an upcoming film, does not meet WP:NFF
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 10:30, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Greenman: I believe it passes NFF. Filming began in June 2018 [1] and the film's production has since received WP:SUSTAINED coverage on all major media houses [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]. In February 2021, Times of India reported that the film is heading towards final lap of filming and called it "one of the most keenly awaited films in Kannada". I see a lot of upcoming American films with Wikipedia articles with much less coverage. M4DU7 (talk) 07:33, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also pinging @Ivanvector: who create-protected 777 Charlie back in August 2018. M4DU7 (talk) 07:36, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: KRBL (company) has been accepted

KRBL (company), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 03:44, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 777 Charlie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 777 Charlie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/777 Charlie (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Chief Minister (Talk) 09:33, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/India/Maharashtra medical cases chart

Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/India/Maharashtra medical cases chart has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 09:42, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is M4DU7 reported by Fishandnotchips. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:17, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I come back from a vacation to this. I had elaborated my keep vote at the talk page of the Meesho AfD albeit after the page got deleted. Meesho definitely passes WP:NCORP and WP:NEXIST; the article would have probably been kept if I had posted my reasoning before the discussion was closed. @Fishandnotchips: is probably just salty because one of their pages got deleted during my deletion drive. Why else would they come back from their 220-day hibernation to report me? M4DU7 (talk) 08:45, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Maduant. Thank you for creating Home First Finance. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:19, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Information icon Hello! I'm MBlaze Lightning. Your recent edit(s) to the page Hindenburg Research appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. This follows your revert on the foregoing page, which reinstated a contentious edit that had been expunged multiple times before for its flagrant misrepresentation of the attendant source. Your removal imputing a "whitewashing attempt" on the anon was presumptuous and unconstructive to boot. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, and you are required to assume good faith in your interactions with others. MBlaze Lightning (talk) 09:24, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Maduant&oldid=1136442283"