Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/.264 Warrior Magnum
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. NorthAmerica1000 00:58, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- .264 Warrior Magnum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There's no claim of notability and there are no sources for verification. The article claims that a company called Warrior Arms was interested in producing this firearm ammunition, but there's no mention of it on the company website.[1] The article was PRODed after its creation, but recreated immediately by the same user, who promised there were many sources,[2] but no one has found any since 2011. Overall, this is a non-notable wildcat cartridge, belonging to a class of articles discussed in this worthwhile essay: User:DeusImperator/I've Got a Wildcat Cartridge for the Wiki So What Now. Rezin (talk) 19:05, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, per nom. There is nada about this round or its inventor out there. --Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 21:34, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Rezin (talk) 19:20, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. Rezin (talk) 19:20, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, I agree with above...Also, no references, and only source of information appears to be Wikipedia and Wiki mirrors.--RAF910 (talk) 05:16, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per above. No reliable sources evidencing notability. — Joaquin008 (talk) 15:16, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.