Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Everton FC friendlies 2011
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 18:17, 6 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 18:17, 6 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 03:14, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Everton FC friendlies 2011 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete. Non-notable practice matches of no importance or significance, fails WP:EVENT, contested prod. WWGB (talk) 13:45, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. —WWGB (talk) 13:50, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete pretty well established that stuff like this goes into the relevent 'My club's results for this year' article so either 2010–11 Everton F.C. season or next seasons depending. Bob House 884 (talk) 17:42, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 12:34, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge - these matches are the pre-season warmup games for the 2011–12 Everton F.C. season, so should be mentioned there and there alone, when that article is created next season. GiantSnowman 12:37, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- (e/c)Merge to season article(s). Bretonbanquet (talk) 12:38, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment we can't merge to something which isn't there & it's not like this information wouldn't be included in the 2011-12 season article anyway. I don't understand what you actually mean by merge here. Bob House 884 (talk) 12:52, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to the current season article until the more appropriate one is created? I will admit that, with this small amount of "information", it doesn't really matter. Bretonbanquet (talk) 22:35, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Sounds pretty reasonable, I would imagine the guys who mantain these sorts of articles have some sort of standard way of dealing with the between season intervals so I would be inclined to leave it to them Bob House 884 (talk) 22:49, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to the current season article until the more appropriate one is created? I will admit that, with this small amount of "information", it doesn't really matter. Bretonbanquet (talk) 22:35, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment we can't merge to something which isn't there & it's not like this information wouldn't be included in the 2011-12 season article anyway. I don't understand what you actually mean by merge here. Bob House 884 (talk) 12:52, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless the 2011–12 Everton F.C. season is created, in which case it can be merged. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 12:49, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not worth a stand-alone article. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 16:43, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Clearly not notable enough to merit a stand alone article. The content isn't completely trivial and could be merged into other articles where appropriate as suggested above. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:25, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. -- Joaquin008 (talk) 17:35, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.