Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good day
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 22:55, 6 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 22:55, 6 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 05:00, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Misshapen article about a song which won't be available on someone's upcoming album and speculation about when it might be released. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Daniel Case 04:59, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom --TBC??? ??? ??? 05:00, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator --Deville (Talk) 05:03, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete —Brim 06:44, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Staxringold 16:54, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Bucketsofg 18:23, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Khoikhoi 22:37, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as crystal ball issue. ProhibitOnions 01:04, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Greedy 00:28, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. ¡Dustimagic! (T/C) 05:23, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per nom. Nigelthefish 17:39, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.