Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lumpy's stuffed bantha
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 18:17, 7 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 18:17, 7 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Maru (talk) 12:40, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I shouldn't need to give any arguments against this but I will: Non-notable. Original research. --Maru (talk) 22:28, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- DELETE. I created the article, and, honestly, I don't know what exactly I was thinking. I had just created it on the star wars wiki, and was quite shocked that they would allow such a thing. So, I wondered if it just might, for some strange reason be allowed here. I honestly don't know how the hell it has been here as long as it has. Sorry to all for even having to look at or deal with this issue. This (I must admit) IS fancruft belongs on the star wars wiki, though I don't even think most fans would even call it notable in star wars. --The Wookieepedian 00:48, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Hopelessly trivial even if it were on a Star Wars fansite. By the way, "beloved secondary character"? That's what put it beyond over the top for me. Might make a good name for a band, though. "Hopelessly Trivial", too, while we're at it. Heh.--RicardoC 04:12, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, delete. I tried to get Adam to merge what content he could with Lumpawarrump, but now that I think about, there's not much to merge other than saying that Lumpy had a stuffed bantha. BrianSmithson 17:34, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- It can now be deleted, as I have I merged this article into the Lumpawarrump page. The Wookieepedian 11:20, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.