Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mirage Studios

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. A valid deletion rationale was not presented. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:13, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mirage Studios

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been tagged as lacking sources for over three years. Sooner or later, we have to say: source it or lose it. A redirect to the Turtles page is an appropriate result IMO. Guy (Help!) 00:08, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 00:56, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:50, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:50, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per sources added by Valoem, the TCJ one in particular being a good solid find. Artw (talk) 16:36, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep A disruptive nomination from Guy, articles should only be nominated when sources cannot be found, not when citations are required. So the answer is source it. This nomination was for clean up not deletion. Valoem ^talk ^contrib 12:28, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep "lacking sources" falls under WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP in that it's an argument to avoid in deletion discussions because it is a surmountable problem. As Valoem has demonstrated, there are seemingly reliable sources available. Mkdw ^talk 20:19, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep and trout the nominator, nonsense nom, blatant lack of Wikipedia:BEFORE, do not waste the community time just because you're too lazy to make the proper searches. Cavarrone 20:40, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.