Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Brick Wall Day
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 02:51, 8 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 02:51, 8 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. NW (Talk) 01:25, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- National Brick Wall Day (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
un-notable unofficial holiday Abc518 (talk) 02:36, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Very strong delete. No indication of any independent coverage. Complete lack of notability. —C.Fred (talk) 02:42, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Without sourcing, this really seems like something some guys thought up one day. Pigman☿/talk 02:43, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Speedily, if possible. Hoax. Location (talk) 02:58, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, made-up/non-notable. Hairhorn (talk) 03:14, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Very strong delete. Just someone making up fake holidays. Dakart (talk) 08:31, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 08:33, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of US-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 08:33, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete. A funny idea, but made-up holidays that didn't receive any independent coverage can not be considered notable, and therefore don't have a place on Wikipedia. McMarcoP (talk) 09:10, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete. Blatant and obvious hoax, per CSD G3. Tckma (talk) 14:29, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, but not speedily. This is not a hoax as there is no deception involved. The article does not, for example, try to masquerade this as an officially designated day or claim it has widespread recognition. There is no established notability, no reliable third-party references, no in-depth coverage in neutral reliable sources, etc, and so it has no place on Wikipedia. I suspect it fails WP:ONEDAY as well, but none of that makes it either a hoax or a speedy deletion candidate. Thryduulf (talk) 16:19, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.