Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Remorse Corps

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was The closing admin making a decision based on your discussion and his discretion...er...delete Sock puppetry ain't cool, either. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 12:28, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No Remorse Corps

Contested prod. Non-notable wrestling tag team, formed less than a week ago. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, no reason why the tiny amount of information can't be in the individual articles. One Night In Hackney 17:29, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I say as creator of this article it's shouldn't be deleted because any ROH/World Tag Team Championship team deserves an article we do know that this is going to be signs of a major faction in ROH judging from comments said about the group--Cowboy From Hell 17:17, 23 February 2007 (UTC)DJ BatWave[reply]

Not true, and we have deleted articles on teams that have won WWE tag titles (which are FAR FAR more importent than some indy title like ROH or PWG). TJ Spyke 01:06, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - When you say "we", what do you mean? that smells of original research and crystal ballery. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:00, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh yeah, and the only sources is you tube. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:03, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment That is an official video posted by the promotion they work for though, so it's not your typical YouTube source. One Night In Hackney 18:08, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Then neither is it a reliable thirdy party source. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:09, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment- If you want more proof I recommend checking the ROH official website--Cowboy From Hell 00:52, 25 February 2007 (UTC)DJ BatWave[reply]

Delete As nominator mentions, this team have (as yet) achieved nothing of note, certainly nothing that cannot be restricted to a brief mention on individual wrestler articles. If, in future, this team were to do so then this article can be recreated. I am a big Ring of Honor fan and do sympathise, but at this time I cannot see an article is merited. Suriel1981 13:51, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I agree with DJ BatWave--MrMorpheus 05:00, 25 February 2007 (UTC)MrMorpheus[reply]
- Comment MrMorpheus is now blocked as a sockpuppet of DJ BatWave. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 09:54, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for good so no non-notable tag team like this can ever appear on Wikipedia, again... — Moe 21:44, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep I see notability in this article as it is a developing important storyline--72.225.255.18 00:51, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - The aboves ip only recent contributions are to this afd and another related wrestling afd.-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 01:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment- Who's generally winning this debate since I'm still green on these topics —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.225.255.18 (talk) 01:19, 27 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

It's not a case of winning, but putting across reasonable, verifiable points of view. The closing Admin will make the decision based on our discussion and his/her discretion. What I will say is that if you believe this article is to do with a developing important storyline then you have to prove it. Suriel1981 06:50, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this article does have to do with an important storyline as it is going to, like the ECW Originals create offshoots of different teams and they are as stated by DJ BatWave (who I advocate upon viewing his history is a competant source I truly believe) now major World Tag Team Champions--72.225.255.18 00:30, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1)This is just some minor indy team and 2)The PWG Tag Team titles are NOT world titles (since only PWG considers them that). PWG's titles are just regular indy titles. TJ Spyke 01:08, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the input DJ BatWave, however Wikipedia editors are not sources and Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. One Night In Hackney 00:37, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not DJ BatWave I just believe what he believes--72.225.255.18 01:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable tag team. No reliable sources either. TJ Spyke 01:06, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment YouTube is a reliable source as it is video footage of of the formation of the team not only is the video run by You Tube it is run by Ring of Honor--72.225.255.18 02:48, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - YouTube is not considered a reliable source. Even if it were, the subject were need multiple non-trivial sources. TJ Spyke 03:40, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think anyone is denying that this team could potentially deserve an article in future if their achievements merit it. However, at this time they haven't done anything notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia. Suriel1981 08:10, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.