Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rokfd
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 01:06, 9 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 01:06, 9 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:37, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Vanity. Flcelloguy Give me a note! Desk 00:46, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - vanity. I thought about speedying that a little while ago but I restrained myself.Splash 00:48, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. 2-person injoke, the second worst kind of vanity. Or third worst, if you include people writing up articles with themselves being married or having affairs with celebrities, but that's sort of in a league of its own. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 01:03, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as nonsense. -- BD2412 talk 01:05, 2005 Jun 17 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Vanity. Pburka 01:38, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per User:BD2412. DS1953 02:19, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete nonsense. JamesBurns 06:55, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete vanity. - Mgm|(talk) 08:16, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete not encyclopedic.--Poli 03:23, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.