Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase
| Requests for page protection | |
|---|---|
|
You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level". Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
| |
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:GS/RUSUKR. Only extended-confirmed editors may make edits related to the topic area... The restriction applies to all edits and pages related to the topic area, broadly construed
, with exceptions allowing non-ECP editors to chat on talk pages.
There's an IP currently trying to edit-war information on where the bullet entered this person's head out of the article, and ECP should be enforced to require them to engage in talk page discussion rather than edit warring (and to prevent future disruption). — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 16:23, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. A brief burst in the last couple of days. Daniel Case (talk) 20:49, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- I just came here to request the same, as an IP continue to disrupt against/ignoring talk page consensus, including after it was declined. Requesting that you reconsider @Daniel Case CT55555(talk) 22:40, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- That editor is at the brink of 3RR and has been warned. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:44, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- They reverted 4 times already actually. Thanks for giving them a warning. CT55555(talk) 22:47, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- That editor is at the brink of 3RR and has been warned. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:44, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- I just came here to request the same, as an IP continue to disrupt against/ignoring talk page consensus, including after it was declined. Requesting that you reconsider @Daniel Case CT55555(talk) 22:40, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Revwescol. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 18:34, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism Msgctl (talk) 19:13, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. DatGuyTalkContribs 21:06, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: I ask for this article protection to prevent them from subsequently putting false information about the singer Saaaaaaam7 (talk) 21:08, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Given this and this, if you intend to contribute constructively here, I suggest you start doing that. --Kinu t/c 21:12, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting protection for this again because IP vandalisms and disruptions are long lasting. Just spotted this edit [1] which significantly reduced casualties without explanation, the edit remained for nearly 2 hours. Ecrusized (talk) 22:11, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 22:24, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Vandalism of BLP by IPs, uncited content etc. CT55555(talk) 22:57, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism resumed immediately when previous block expired. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 23:10, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An essay that is, for some reason, getting more than the usual amount of disruptive edits. Barely anything has changed in the past 50 edits. ~~lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 23:23, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:11, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors kept on adding unsourced and vandalism edits since Feb 1, 2023. Cassiopeia talk 23:24, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism; I suggest maybe indef semi. Thiscouldbeauser (talk) 00:14, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: In the month of February, disruptive editing and BLP violations. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 00:40, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from various IP users over the last few days; ranging from changing an episode's production code for no reason, to adding an episode not listed in reliable sources. BrickMaster02 (talk) 00:52, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 01:03, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing IP sockpuppetry. DanielRigal (talk) 02:07, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Clearly not vandalism. The edits in question only removed unnecessary and highly subjective phrasing, and better organized things, so that the trial is covered before its aftermath. 79.60.232.33 (talk) 02:16, 10 February 2023 (UTC)