Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virginal Young Blondes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:44, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Virginal Young Blondes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's an unreferenced article about a 16-minute film by a non-notable director. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:58, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I was unable to find any coverage of this film in independent reliable sources. It seems to have attracted no critical attention. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 22:30, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:03, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:03, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Filmmaker:Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Year:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Comment: Cullen... it all depends on one's search parameters. I found an article in Film Threat and one in New York Post. If we have just one more, I'd say "keep" per barely meeting WP:NF for a short film. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 02:39, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply Well, you are clearly better at searching for film sources than I am, MichaelQSchmidt. You know I respect your skills and knowledge. That first source seems to be significant coverage, though much of the plot summary seems quite similar to this Wikipedia article. Did our article paraphrase this article, or were both based on a summary issued by the filmmaker? But no matter. The second source is little more a brief recap of the first, but it does indicate a degree of interest in the filmmaker's body of work that I was unable to find. So count me as receptive to changing my recommendation if other good sources are found. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:09, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:22, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:30, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tentative Delete - I can't find any significant coverage aside from the ones posted above. It definitely hurts that these search terms also pull up a heck of a lot of pornhub hits, so it's tough to find the news coverage. If someone can find some more reliable sources, I'll change my vote, but for the time being, it's a delete from me. Cpuser20 (talk) 03:18, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.