Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuki Brando

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 19:24, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tuki Brando

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet Wikipedia's eligibility (notability) criteria. Extremely limited career, aside of being "the son of". Severely lacking content and multiple reliable sources. WikiMeWiki (talk) 09:05, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 10:37, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 10:37, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 13:48, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 01:10, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:43, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Out of the three sources in the article, one is a news item about Christian Brando's death where the subject's name is in the list of relatives, the second is a Vogue Italia brief write-up, and the third link is dead. Searching for more mentions online brings up the briefest of mentions (such as here) as "the relative of so-and-so," social media pages, YouTube clips, brief mentions w/pic in celebrity mags such as Voici (here), which are simple listings or promos, or brief write-ups in mainstream newspapers (as in here, for a clumsy one). The Daily Mail crap only makes it worse. Typical effort in the media by the PR/mgmt people, but here, at best, WP:TOOSOON. -The Gnome (talk) 10:01, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.