Talk:106th Cavalry Regiment/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:30, 1 May 2011 (UTC) I'll get to this sometime in the next week. BTW, you might as well start looking up the connection of 1-106 Avn to the regiment as well as the existence of E/106 Cav for most of the 80s and 90s.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:30, 1 May 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   At least one citation per paragraph.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   No mention of 1/106 AVN, which may trace to 106th Cav. No mention of E/106 CAV. When did 2/106 CAV form?

   B. Focused:

   Move the Heraldry section to the end. It's not the most important thing about the unit. Fourragere's and Croix de Palms are not Battle Honors.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Picture from Afghanistan would be useful.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Failed as non-responsive.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:29, 26 May 2011 (UTC)