Talk:Hori7on
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Template:WPASIA10k
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
New article turned to draft awaiting review
CC: User:Ayamano2021
Hori7on page is already created. What's the need to put it under review if we both know the page is good to go? Not only that, you took ALL my edits and made it yours. If you think my edits is not encyclopedic, why not revise it yourself, not copy the whole thing to make it yours, then put it under review with you as the author? If you have any issues with the page, please let me know or edit them. We can also let other Wikipedia volunteers to help us with our discussion, if needed. Thank you. 001Jrm (talk) 17:33, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hori7on page on the draft was created before the Dream Maker commercial break, 22:13, 12 February 2023 (Draft:Hori7on) versus this article 00:44, 14 February 2023 (Hori7on) and also im so sorry to use your article's text i have to revert it back into my edit instead. Ayamano2021 (talk) 17:42, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
- I see, I wasn't aware. However, if you think I did something wrong, you could have just messaged me. I saw that you sent it for review after you used my edits, which means you were already aware that the page is up. That, I don't understand. Wikipedia is an online community wherein "anyone can be bold and edit an existing article or create a new one". Since there is already an existing article that is up, I guess it's better to participate in it rather than making a new one with the same/similar content. I'm sorry if I didn't see your draft, but know that your participation is appreciated. 001Jrm (talk) 18:03, 14 February 2023 (UTC)