Jump to content

User talk:OxfordSinger

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 08:45, 15 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Regarding Commotio (choir)

[edit]

Firstly, here is my opening advice, be bold, I have had a look at google to see how notable Commotio is as an article, and they seem to have lots of reviews in the press and released a CD which has been reviewed in music journals and newspapers, so I think you should go for it because it seems to be ok, although you can wait until Pedro gets here and get his verdict.--KerotanLeave Me a Message Have a nice day :) 13:38, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thanks for your enquiry at the help desk! The proposed article should be fine - Google shows that the grouip is notable and the information Verfiable. Rememember when you write the article not to contain any original research of your own - see WP:NOR. Try to cite the information from third parties - for example from Google hits that are not your own website. Please click on any of the links in blue in this paragraph for more information, although I suspect from your question at the help desk you know some of the policies already. Please feel free to contact me at my talk page (click "chat" on my signature) if you need any help. Good luck, and thankyou for helping us build an encyclopedia! Pedro |  Chat  13:35, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Commotio (Oxford-based choir) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Commotio (Oxford-based choir) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commotio (Oxford-based choir) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Velella  Velella Talk   17:16, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]