Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future warrior: Hero of tomorrow...today
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 17:20, 18 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 17:20, 18 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 00:10, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Future warrior: Hero of tomorrow...today (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Both rumoured and unofficial sequel to low budget Z-list film Future War that hasn't been released yet, is the debut for everyone involved apparently and searching for it brings back zero results. To say this fails notability standards is an understatement. –– Lid(Talk) 05:41, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, WP:NFF. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 08:50, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete db-nocontext. JuJube (talk) 08:52, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, I don't believe this meets speedy guidelines. However, no sources cited and only G-hit is to the Wikipedia article. Fails WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NFF. Redfarmer (talk) 10:20, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Zero results in both google search, books and news. Article is about a a film that isn't even released yet. It fails notability and future guidelines. Also, the creator of the article is a single purpose account. Atyndall93 | talk 10:27, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not a crystal ball. JIP | Talk 11:18, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NFF. Happyme22 (talk) 17:23, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:56, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.