Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Jossi

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Jossi}} to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Jossi

• Jossi (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Sfacets (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• G:

If confirmed this checkuser will present perhaps one of the most amusingly clever case of sockpuppetry in WP history. Two editors, one of them an admin, meeting infrequently if only to doubleteam somebody to the edge of the stream in an article's discussion page, in making official comments (as in the case of an Rfc), or when casting votes. What is really, really good about this particular situation is that one does not need to present a lengthy summary of evidence to convince concerned authorities of the merits of the case. A single evidence would suffice to make anyone curious enough to run a checkuser. Here is it:

On 14 January 2007 Sfacets and Jossi were edit warring with somebody in their usual doubleteam mode in the article Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath. Apparently all were doing well when suddenly Sfacets made a simple "slip," a typo, and anyone looking at his edit history will easily see that he, along with his buddy Jossi, hates making typos. They review what they write and correct the typo as soon as possible. In this case the typo was simply undecipherable. Sfacets wrote: "... organization wh' stted mission ..." Amazingly enough less than 3 minutes later Jossi came and effortlessly corrected the typo as if they share the same brain. Jossi wrote: "... organization whose stated mission ..." and carefully noted it as a minor edit consistent with what he just did 3 times in a row (minus the one as Sfacets, which he seems to have forgotten). Here is the compelling evidence for your viewing pleasure. Thank you for your kind attention! File:ExcaliburSword.jpgSentinel 01:01, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

 Declined. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 01:44, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Hey, not fair. I know the evidence presented was simple but undeniably worth looking at nevertheless. You should have at least tried. Now we will never know the truth. - File:ExcaliburSword.jpgSentinel 17:26, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.