User talk:Eeekster/Archives/2013/March
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Eeekster. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Daehyun Elementary School's Notability
Hi Eeekster,
I'm fairly new to Wikipedia and therefore not sure of the protocol. Should I move the previous discussion I was having on your talk page about the notability of Daehyun Elementary School to the article's talk page?
Thank you,
Rystheguy (talk) 00:40, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
- That would be a good place for it. Eeekster (talk) 00:50, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Why are you being mean to me.
Why dont you like the things i say to you
--Jpin10 (talk) 01:18, 4 March 2013 (UTC)jpin10
- Name calling isn't acceptable here. And you've been vandalizing articles. Eeekster (talk) 01:44, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Citing Sources
Whenever I tend to cite a source, the warning still appears at the top of the page. HELP!! I have a website I want to site and its not a plain url, but the warning keeps appearing. Its really annoying! The source is reliable
savraj67 17:56, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- I can't understand what you are trying to ask about. Eeekster (talk) 18:14, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
NCAA Division II independent site
I'm trying to properly edit the information that's on the NCAA Division II independent site. Under Future Member, Bluefield State College is listed. I work in the athletics department of Bluefield State College and have attempted to remove that iformation but you keep putting it back. I'm not vandalising the site, I'm trying to make your page as accurate as possible. There is no reference any where that says that we are a future independent. Can you please remove that from that page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BSCAthletics (talk • contribs) 21:18, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
- You give no reason for removing content so what are we to think? Eeekster (talk) 21:32, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Stop pretending to be an admin
You're not an admin and have no right to make the "corrections" that you do. Please stop before I report you to a real admin for "edit-warring" based on false information. I've been around WP long enough to know what admins can and can't do and how they behave. You act like a normal WPian with a personal agenda. Stop following my edits, please. It's apparent you're targeting everything I post. JaMikePA (talk) 20:41, 11 March 2013 (UTC).
- I don't have to be an admin and if you continue with your disruptive editing you will be blocked. Eeekster (talk) 20:42, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Your POV is not the law. You have to be an admin to do what you're doing. I will be reporting your vandalism to a real admin. Your whole existence on WP is to destroy other user's works. Try creating instead of destroying. You have no authority to do the things you're doing.
- See the "User:Eekster" section at WP:ANI, where JaMikePA has reported you. He's supposed to inform you when he goes there to ask for you to be sanctioned; I don't know why he didn't. Nyttend (talk) 21:19, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- It's hardly worth answering. He's removing maint. and delete templates without correcting problems and is objecting to those edits being reverted as vandalism. Eeekster (talk) 21:21, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- To the contrary — your response was quite helpful. I'd already come to the same conclusion (it's hard to come to any other conclusion), but it's better for multiple people to say something. Since your "violations" of 3RR were all to enforce our copyright policy, you deserve praise rather than a {{uw-ewblock}}. I've given him a 3RR warning and will block him if I catch him reverting any more; let me know if you catch him. Nyttend (talk) 21:28, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- It's hardly worth answering. He's removing maint. and delete templates without correcting problems and is objecting to those edits being reverted as vandalism. Eeekster (talk) 21:21, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Why are you tagging images for speedy deletion
I do not understand why you are tagging the images I have uploaded to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goddard_College for speedy deletion and claiming they are copyrighted materials. They are available on flikr and are clearly not copyrighted. They are listed as such. I am new to WP and would love it if you could explain to me in simple language how I can upload these photographs so that you will leave them alone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Progressive Ed (talk • contribs) 22:31, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- Did you read the note I left on your take page? In short they are copyright protected and the license given on Flikr is not compatible with our requirements. Please stop uploading them. Eeekster (talk) 22:40, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Eeekster, Am I correct in thinking that if the license given on flikr for the images in question was Attribution-ShareAlike Creative Commons then it would be compatible with your requirement? I would love to upload them the correct way so that I could move on to other projects. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Progressive Ed (talk • contribs) 00:54, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
- If that was the license, then yes. But it's not the license given on Flikr. Eeekster (talk) 03:18, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
William Collins image
If you scroll to the bottom of the page I referenced as evidence of permission, you will see on the left side the "cc" logo followed by the phrase "Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative 3.0 License." The phrase is linked on that site, just like it is here. When you read the description of that license, it clearly states that "You are free: to Share — to copy, distribute and transmit the work, to make commercial use of the work"
So is there some other compelling reason that file was speedy deleted or am I correct that this was a mistake? Help me out. Greg Bard (talk) 02:17, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
- The reason is "No Derivative". That's not acceptable here. Eeekster (talk) 02:32, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Picture Deletion
Hi Eeekster:
I was not sure if/how a picture file should be deleted. The picture is found on the page Siavash Kheirabi. The user claims that it is his/her own work but the markings on the picture suggests he pulled it off a website without permission. Should this picture be deleted and under which section? I was thinking under F9 or F11. Thanks.
Sosthenes12 (talk) 00:23, 16 March 2013 (UTC)Sosthenes12
- If you can find the URL of the page he lifted it from, use F9. Otherwise bring it up for discussion. Eeekster (talk) 07:03, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for being a vandal fighter.--I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 02:04, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
C3 Technologies
I was editing that page and it get deleted when I submitted new information. How was it violating rules? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Georgij Michaliutin (talk • contribs) 22:37, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
- Why is that company notable? Eeekster (talk) 22:51, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
- It was a not that small company that a big company (Apple) acquired, and it stands for the 3D maps in Nokia's maps (Here maps) and later Apple's own iOS maps. It is more detailed than Google's own, and it had that technology more than a year before Google presented it's own that still is behind in details. I think that that company have done something pretty revolutionary in 3D image in consumer world. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Georgij Michaliutin (talk • contribs) 23:14, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
- As I remember the article it was purely promotional sounding and said nothing to establish notability. Eeekster (talk) 00:14, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
- It was a not that small company that a big company (Apple) acquired, and it stands for the 3D maps in Nokia's maps (Here maps) and later Apple's own iOS maps. It is more detailed than Google's own, and it had that technology more than a year before Google presented it's own that still is behind in details. I think that that company have done something pretty revolutionary in 3D image in consumer world. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Georgij Michaliutin (talk • contribs) 23:14, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Jeffrey A. Winters
Whatever. Thanks for reminding me why I left Wikipedia. Deletionists like you are just an energy suck. --Brian Fenton (talk) 23:08, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
- You might try establishing notability instead of posting insults and whining. Eeekster (talk) 23:10, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
C.S.Nadagouda
Hi. I've declined your A7 because he is claimed to be/have been an MLA - that passes A7 (unless there is evidence that he wasn't, in which case hoax would come in...). Peridon (talk) 11:52, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Bundy - apologies
Just noticed that in my zeal to revert vandalism that you had already reverted on the Ted Bundy page, I inadvertently reverted your revert. Apologies for my clumsiness, it's all been sorted out now. DoctorJoeE review transgressions/talk to me! 20:13, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
Copyright issues
I see you placed tags on two images uploaded by User:Infohollywood. I'm not at liberty to disclose what is in OTRS emails, but lets both keep an eye on this editor.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 18:35, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Jeffrey A. Winters
I've attempted to show notability on the article. Please see the most recent edit and the article talk page for discussion. --Brian Fenton (talk) 00:59, 30 March 2013 (UTC)