Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Bied
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 21:38, 28 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 21:38, 28 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy delete. -- RHaworth 17:37, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable bio. The author Walsh415bostoncollege has reposted this after it was userfied so I will allow him an AfD. -- RHaworth 23:21, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Completely and totally non-notable. Powers 23:25, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not notable enough. Latinus 23:42, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete or re-userfy as non-notable bio. OhnoitsJamieTalk 23:43, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy and post a note on his talk page informing him of his error and warning him if it happens again it will be deleted.Since you'd already done that the first time, definitely Delete. —simpatico hi 06:29, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]- Speedy delete as non-notable vanity biography. Tagged as {{nn-bio}}. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-25 11:16Z
- Speedy delete, warn the user, and {{deletedpage}} it. Stifle 11:24, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.