Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mother nation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 15:05, 1 March 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 15:26, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Mother nation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems like a manifesto term made by a non-notable UK political party unrelated to currently linked party (Conservatives). Mattg82 (talk) 18:34, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I think the term may have been coined here. However, I can't see any uses of this term outside this blog. If someone does find where it's being used, this term should really go in the article of the person/group who is using it. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 09:49, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I don't think its use is not widespread enough to justify notability. Almost something of a WP:NEO violation, but it's not quite a neologism. Or maybe it is, I can't make up my mind, Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 21:31, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It is a phrase used once only in 2006 by an grouping as listed by User:Chris Neville-Smith with a Web site at progcon.org which is now dead. No notability at all and quite possibly never intended to be a new political idea. Sussexonian (talk) 00:35, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.