User talk:Caj94/Elaboration likelihood model
Peer Review
I liked how you included a study to show how they were more influenced by the explanation using Monroe’s motivated sequence. I would suggest you add more details about why the explanation using Monroe’s motivated sequence was extremely higher for them to understand. This would give the reader a better understanding. The most important thing you could do to improve the article would be to add more details about the study. Other than that, great job! Peerdrew12 (talk) 18:36, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for the feedback, especially on Monroe's motivated sequence in order to give the reader a better understanding. Looking forward to adding more details about the study. Caj94 (talk) 23:53, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
I like how you explained what your research is and how it works. However I do think that you should think about adding examples. I also think that you should add more detail on your study. Other than that you done a great job! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pudge10 (talk • contribs) 22:36, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for the feedback! Adding more examples and more details will definitely improve the article. Caj94 (talk) 00:03, 4 March 2023 (UTC)