User talk:OreL.D
How came! You have been so long with us and no one has welcome you yet?! So now you are officially welcome to the English Wikipedia! Probably you don't need all the links below, but just in case! ;0) --Dia^ (talk) 21:45, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]
|
Invitation to take part in a pilot study
[edit]I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to a short survey. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates only 5 minutes. cooldenny (talk) 19:27, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
Minor edits
[edit]Hi, this edit at Nakba Day probably doesn't qualify as a minor edit per Help:Minor edit. It's a contentious subject as you know and many editors opt to not show minor edits by default so they wouldn't see your edit in their watchlist. Would be possible for you to have a read through Help:Minor edit when you have time and adjust your editing accordingly particularly in contentious articles covered by discretionary sanctions ? Thanks. Sean.hoyland - talk 17:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
- Alright, I am reading it and I'll, as you said, adjust my-self. Thank you. OreL.D (talk) 18:35, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Palestinian cause article
[edit]Hi. An article you've edited, Palestinian cause was recently cut back to a stub and then redirected, in these two edits, which I've now reverted. The article needs development and additional cites, but if the editor who made those edits thinks it has no value, and is improper for Wikipedia, then he needs to take it to AfD rather than effecting a unilateral deletion with a redirect, in my opinion. Since it's a new article, and has been edited by only a few contributors so far, I've posted this identical message to each of their talk pages, including that of the editor who made these two edits. Please note the talk-page warning that this article is under ARBPIA restrictions, including the restriction that no editor may make more than one revert in a 24-hour period.
On an unrelated note, I'd be your best friend forever if you'd start using edit summaries. :-) Best regards, – OhioStandard (talk) 17:16, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Invitation to WikiProject Judaism
[edit] |
An invitation to join us! If you are already a member of WikiProject Judaism, disregard this message. | |
|
Hello OreL.D, you're invited to participate in WikiProject Judaism, a WikiProject dedicated to developing and improving articles about all aspects of Judaism and Jewish Life. You can check out the Judaism WikiProject page for more information about the project and what our goals are. You can join by adding your name here. We hope to see you join us! ___________ -Invited on 1 July 2011 by Magister Scienta. |
Comment
[edit]Hi, I've seen you make some valuable contributions to a considerable number of articles (including this one, which seems to me to have been correct but I'll have to examine it more closely over the weekend). Three words of advice: 1. Don't mark your edits as minor unless they meet the criteria at WP:MINOR. 2. Use edit summaries so other editors can understand what you're doing. 3. Make it a habit to visit article Discussion pages to see if other editors have discussed the changes you're trying to address in your edit.—Biosketch (talk) 05:21, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Konrad Heiden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mithridates (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)