Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/PuckMV

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Puckmv

Final (0/8/0) ended 22:41, 12 June 2006 (UTC) (withdrawn by candidate[1])

Puckmv (talk · contribs) – I am a user who in the past has been childish in my approach to Wikipedia, however in the future I have begun to and want to help contribute positively to this encyclopedia and I think by becoming an Administrator, I can do this much better. Puckmv 22:41, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I Accept my Nomination:
Support

Oppose

Not enough contributions. Stephen B Streater 22:57, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 22:57, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Horribly malformed RfA, incapable of following instructions. Candidate has less than 100 edits. I suggest withdrawing this nomination and reapplying when you are more familiar with Wikipedia. --Lord Deskana ^{Dark Lord of the Sith} 22:57, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose 99 edits when I last checked, too new. Also appears to have trouble with wiki-formatting whilst making this rfa.--Andeh 23:06, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close before the pileon really begins. --Golbez 23:12, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Sorry, but you really don't have enough experience. Suggest withdrawal or early close by b'crat. DarthVad e r 23:19, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
"Oppose' Not enough experience. ForestH2
Oppose, suggest withdrawal. --Rory096 23:39, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

Comments

Count with Tool2:

Username Puckmv
Total edits 99
Distinct pages edited 19
Average edits/page 5.211
First edit 17:14, April 26, 2006

(main) 14
Talk 10
User 10
User talk 56
Wikipedia 9

NOTE TO ALL: due to the messed up RFA, it appeared Puck didn't realise that the MV in his/her username was lowercase so it caused a big mouldy pizza! I made a bunch of fixes, you can check the history over here if you wish.--Andeh 23:01, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
See Puckmv's edit summary usage with Mathbot's tool.

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

I would anticipate helping with NPOV disputes, and Fair Use Review Requested cases.

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

I am pleased with my work on reverting vandalism to pages and adding information to Marquette University High School

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

I have been in 1 major conflict since my start here at WIKIPEDIA. The first one, I edited a users comments on my talk page, which I regret fully and completely and promise never to continue this in the future. I also removed a Warning from my talk page, however, I have also promised never to do this again.

DriniQuestion

Do you think admins performing actions (deletions, blocks) for reasons not covered on policy should be sanctioned? If so, how? -- Drini 23:16, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.

--Voice-of-All 23:48, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]