Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masthaven
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 01:42, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Masthaven (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Written too much like an advert. There is a section which even introduces products by the bank. Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 16:19, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:SPIP, complete spam. Topic has no indications of notabilty - another run-of-the-mill company, fails GNG and WP:NCORP -- HighKing++ 20:08, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as G11; 100% spam & promotional 'cruft with no non-promotional version to revert to. I requested a speedy deletion; let's see if it takes. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:46, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.