Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Source (record label)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Spinnin' Records. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 01:46, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source (record label)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability, sources are all WP:PRIMARY. Redirect to Spinnin' Music. Karst (talk) 21:36, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the relevant page. - TheMagnificentist 06:43, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as it's definitely notable and the sources aren't primary (Beatport for example isn't a Source asset). If sourcing needs to be further expanded then it's better to use the appropriate tag at the top of the page. Also, there are significant coverage of reliable sources on Google. 141.138.146.132 (talk) 10:11, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm staying out of this a little bit since I got involved with the creator's unblock request, but I just want to point out that the above user provides no proof of notability. Drmies (talk) 04:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 02:56, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect and merge into Spinnin' Records. No authoritative references are provided and nothing shows notability on its own.--Rpclod (talk) 03:47, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:38, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:38, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:38, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.