Jump to content

User talk:Andrewsmith12345

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Andrewsmith12345 (talk | contribs) at 23:23, 12 March 2023 (→Blocked as a sockpuppet: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hello, Andrewsmith12345, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 22:06, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Drug Addicts Anonymous (DAA) (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 22:06, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Andrewsmith12345! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 22:06, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Drug Addicts Anonymous per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Drug Addicts Anonymous. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mz7 (talk) 22:28, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am not a Sock i have already been unblocked once and found to not be a Sockpuppet. I am not to do with the link above and certanly not evading blocks. Please review this as i have had this happen twice now and not sure why it keeps happening. Andrewsmith12345 (talk) 22:33, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Andrewsmith12345 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

so you must conclude as that is you have no evidence. Can you prove I have another account as I can confirm I don’t. Andrewsmith12345 (talk) 23:23, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=so you must conclude as that is you have no evidence. Can you prove I have another account as I can confirm I don’t. [[User:Andrewsmith12345|Andrewsmith12345]] ([[User talk:Andrewsmith12345#top|talk]]) 23:23, 12 March 2023 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=so you must conclude as that is you have no evidence. Can you prove I have another account as I can confirm I don’t. [[User:Andrewsmith12345|Andrewsmith12345]] ([[User talk:Andrewsmith12345#top|talk]]) 23:23, 12 March 2023 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=so you must conclude as that is you have no evidence. Can you prove I have another account as I can confirm I don’t. [[User:Andrewsmith12345|Andrewsmith12345]] ([[User talk:Andrewsmith12345#top|talk]]) 23:23, 12 March 2023 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Andrewsmith12345 (talk) 23:23, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Andrewsmith12345 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a Sock i have already been unblocked once and found to not be a Sockpuppet. I am not to do with the link above and certanly not evading blocks. Please review this as i have had this happen twice now and not sure why it keeps happening. Andrewsmith12345 (talk) 22:37, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This doesn't address the information in the SPI. Nor does it address the fact that this account has not been previously blocked so I must conclude you have at least one other account. 331dot (talk) 23:13, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Andrewsmith12345&oldid=1144297232"