Jump to content

A Perfect Day for Bananafish

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 86.190.224.83 (talk) at 08:12, 14 March 2023 (Vocabulary). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

"A Perfect Day for Bananafish" is a short story by J. D. Salinger, originally published in the January 31, 1948, issue of The New Yorker. It was anthologized in 1949's 55 Short Stories from the New Yorker, as well as in Salinger's 1953 collection, Nine Stories. The story is an enigmatic examination of a young married couple, Muriel and Seymour Glass, while on vacation in Florida.[1] It is the first of his stories to feature a member of the fictional Glass family.

When 28-year-old Salinger submitted the manuscript to The New Yorker in January 1947, entitled "The Bananafish",[2] its arresting dialogue and precise style[3] were read with interest by fiction editor William Maxwell and his staff, though the point of the story, in this original version, was considered to be incomprehensible.[1]

At Maxwell's urging, Salinger embarked upon a major reworking of the piece, adding the opening section with Muriel's character, and crafting the material to provide insights into Seymour's tragic demise.[1] Salinger, in frequent consultation with editor Gus Lobrano, revised the story numerous times throughout 1947, renaming it "A Fine Day for Bananafish".[1][4] The New Yorker published the final version as "A Perfect Day for Bananafish" one year after Salinger had first submitted the manuscript.[1]

The effort was met with immediate acclaim, and according to Salinger biographer Paul Alexander, it was "the story that would permanently change his standing in the literary community."[4] Salinger's decision to collaborate with Maxwell and The New Yorker staff in developing the story marked a major advance in his career[5] and led to his entry into the echelon of elite writers at the journal.[6] The story has been compared to F. Scott Fitzgerald's "May Day."[7]

Plot summary

The story is set at a large seaside resort in Florida. Muriel Glass, a wealthy and self-absorbed woman, phones her mother from her suite to discuss Muriel's husband Seymour, a World War II combat veteran recently discharged from an army hospital; it is implied that he was being evaluated for a psychiatric disorder.[8] Muriel's mother is concerned by reports of her son-in-law's increasingly bizarre and anti-social actions, and warns her daughter that he may "lose control of himself". Muriel dismisses her remarks as hyperbole, regarding her husband's idiosyncrasies as benign and manageable.

Meanwhile, at the resort's adjoining beach, a child named Sybil Carpenter has been left unsupervised by her mother so that she may drink at the hotel bar.[8] Sybil wanders on the beach and finds Seymour, lying in solitude a quarter-mile from the hotel. Sybil reproaches Seymour for allowing another little girl, Sharon Lipschutz, to sit with him the previous night as he played the lounge piano for the hotel's guests.[9] Seymour attempts to placate Sybil by suggesting they "catch a Bananafish", but Sybil insists that Seymour choose between her and Sharon Lipschutz. Seymour responds that he observed Sybil abusing a hotel patron's dog, and the girl falls silent.

Seymour places Sybil on a rubber raft and wades into the water, where he tells her the story of "the very tragic life" of the bananafish: they gorge themselves on bananas, become too large to escape their feeding holes, and die.[10] Sybil is unfazed by the story, and claims that she sees a bananafish with six bananas in its mouth. Seymour affectionately kisses the arch of one of her feet, and returns her to shore, where she departs.

Once alone, and returning to the hotel, Seymour becomes less affable. He starts a baseless argument with a woman in an elevator, accusing her of staring at his feet and calling her a "god-damned sneak". He returns to his hotel room, where his wife is taking a nap. He retrieves a pistol from his luggage and shoots himself.

Background on publication and style

Before publication of the story, Salinger had reworked the details in a meeting with William Maxwell. Originally, the story consisted merely of Seymour's incident on the beach with Sybil Carpenter, and the consequent suicide. Maxwell argued that there was no clear explanation that justified Seymour killing himself. After the author's encounter with Maxwell, the portion of the story with Muriel speaking to her mother on the phone was incorporated.[11] After the triumph of "A Perfect Day for Bananafish," Salinger allowed the New Yorker to have the first chance at printing all of his subsequent writing by signing a contract with the magazine.[12]

Despite some differing critical opinion, Salinger's Nine Stories, in which "A Perfect Day for Bananafish" appears, are not separate entities published together. Author Eberhard Alsen, in A Reader’s Guide to J.D Salinger, observes that the stories evolve chronologically. They change in a way that mirrors Salinger's personal life and his experiences with religion.[13] Many scholars and critics have analyzed and reviewed the character of Seymour Glass in regards to his war time experiences and suicide.[14][15][16] His daughter, Margaret Salinger, recalls her father's stories from World War II and makes a connection between Salinger and the character of Seymour in "A Perfect Day for Bananafish". Author Ron Rosenbaum draws from Margaret Salinger's memories to elicit a connection between Salinger's progression from bleak to optimistic, and the spiritual writing style in Nine Stories.[17]

Salinger was also greatly influenced by Ernest Hemingway's writing style and narration method. Hemingway writes in such a way that the reader has to interpret and draw his or her own conclusions when characters are speaking. The vague description common to Hemingway's narrative dialogue appears in several of Salinger's stories and novels.[13]

Reception and criticism

Though "Slight Rebellion off Madison" was published in the New Yorker and met with acclaim, Salinger continued to face rejection afterwards. The New Yorker consistently dismissed further stories submitted by Salinger. Unfazed, Salinger continued to submit work to the New Yorker because he believed that the editors of the magazine would publish more of his stories. After sending the initial draft entitled "The Bananafish" to the New Yorker, Harold Ober, agent of the author, received a letter from William Maxwell, a fiction editor at the magazine. The letter, from January 22, 1947, stated: "We like parts of The Bananafish by J.D. Salinger very much, but it seems to us to lack any discernible story or point. If Mr. Salinger is around town, perhaps he'd like to come in and talk to us about New Yorker stories."[11]

When "A Perfect Day for Bananafish" was first published, the initial reception and criticism of the short story was positive. Readers were accepting of the new tone being presented to literature through Salinger's short stories, and it was the release of "A Perfect Day for Bananafish" that popularized Salinger's name in the literary community.[11]

Much of the criticism regarding the story involves the character of Seymour Glass, who makes an appearance in several other of Salinger's short stories. Most of the content fueling Seymour's criticism involves his war experiences and suicide. Critics interpret evidence from the story to determine what the actual cause of Seymour's suicide was due to conflicting reasoning presented in other stories that include the Glass family. Some believe it was the entire world that drove Seymour to madness while others draw a connection to post-traumatic stress.[18] According to critic Janet Malcolm, the world portrayed in the story is both tangled and simplified by Salinger. This "dualism" can be found in other works of Salinger, as he repeatedly depicts life "as a battleground between the normal and abnormal, the ordinary and the extraordinary, the talentless and the gifted, the well and the sick."[19]

Analysis

Like the eldest son of the Glass family, Salinger was deeply affected by his experiences as a combat soldier in WWII, and these informed his writing.[20] Kenneth Slawenski reports that Salinger, in his Seymour – An Introduction (1959), confesses that the young man in Bananafish "was not Seymour at all but... myself."[10] Traumatized by the Battle of the Bulge and the Nazi concentration camps,[21] Salinger "found it impossible to fit into a society that ignored the truth that he now knew."[10]

Children figure prominently in Salinger's works.[22] Seymour's sympathetic and affectionate interaction with children is contrasted with the detached and phony behavior of adults.[10] In the aftermath of his interlude with Sybil, Seymour "has drawn his own conclusions regarding the makeup of human beings and the world around him" and commits suicide.[10]

T. S. Eliot's The Waste Land and Bananafish

Salinger quotes a verse from the poem The Waste Land by poet T. S. Eliot in the following exchange between Seymour and Sybil, regarding the little girl's young rival, Sharon Lipschutz:

"Ah, Sharon Lipschutz", said the young man. "How that name comes up. Mixing memory and desire." He suddenly got to his feet. He looked at the ocean. "Sybil," he said, "I'll tell you what we'll do. We'll see if we can catch a bananafish."

"A what?"

"A bananafish," he said... [emphasis added]

The stanza that contains the verse is from Section I of The Waste Land – "The Burial of the Dead":

April is the cruelest month, breeding
Lilacs out of the dead land, mixing
Memory and desire, stirring
Dull roots with spring rain. [emphasis added]

"The Burial of the Dead" begins with an excerpt from Petronius Arbiter's Satyricon, which reads: "For once I saw with my own eyes the Cumean Sibyl hanging in a jar, and when the boys asked her, 'Sibyl, what do you want?' she answered, 'I want to die.'"

Slawenski argues that Salinger's choice of the name Sybil for the little girl establishes an "unmistakable" correlation between Eliot's depiction of the Cumaean Sybil of Greek myth and Seymour's story of the bananafish.[10] The bananafish are "doomed by greed" and thus share the fate of Eliot's Sybil, "cursed by relentless existence."[10]

Notes

  1. ^ a b c d e Slawenski, 2010, p. 159
  2. ^ Slawenski, 2010, p. 158
  3. ^ Slawenski, 2010, pp. 158–159
  4. ^ a b Alexander, 1999, p. 124
  5. ^ Slawenski, 2010, p. 159, p. 168
  6. ^ Slawenski, 2010, p. 168
  7. ^ Smith, Dominic (2003). "Salinger's Nine Stories: Fifty Years Later". The Antioch Review. 61 (4): 639–649. doi:10.2307/4614550. ISSN 0003-5769. JSTOR 4614550.
  8. ^ a b Slawenski, 2010, p. 160
  9. ^ Salinger, 1948, p. 14
  10. ^ a b c d e f g Slawenski, 2010, p. 161
  11. ^ a b c Shields, David; Salerno, Shane (2013-09-03). Salinger (First Simon & Schuster hardcover ed.). New York. ISBN 9781476744834. OCLC 827262667.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  12. ^ "JD Salinger | Timeline of Major Events | American Masters | PBS". American Masters. 2014-01-15. Retrieved 2018-04-27.
  13. ^ a b Alsen, Eberhard (2002). A Reader's Guide to J.D Salinger. Connecticut: Greenwood Press. ISBN 0-313-31078-5.
  14. ^ Cotter, James (Winter 1989). "A Source for Seymour's Suicide: Rilke's Voices and Salinger's Nine Stories". Papers on Language and Literature. 25: 83–98 – via EBSCOhost.
  15. ^ Ooms, Julie (2016). ""Some Quick, However Slight, Therapy": Neighborliness and Rebuilding Community after War in J. D. Salinger's War Stories". Christian Scholar's Review. 46: 46–63. ProQuest 1873850940.
  16. ^ Alsen, Eberhard (Spring 2002). "New Light on the Nervous Breakdowns of Salinger's Sergeant X and Seymour Glass". CLA Journal. 45 (3): 379–387. JSTOR 44325109.
  17. ^ Rosenbaum, Ron (October 8, 2000). "The Flight From Fortress Salinger". archive.nytimes.com. Retrieved 2018-04-27.
  18. ^ Menand, Louis (October 1, 2001). "Holden at Fifty". The New Yorker.
  19. ^ Malcolm, Janet (2001-06-21). "Justice to J.D. Salinger". The New York Review of Books. ISSN 0028-7504. Retrieved 2018-04-30.
  20. ^ Bailey, 2011
  21. ^ Slawenski, 2010, p. 161, p. 173
  22. ^ Slawenski, 2010, p. 172

Sources