Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Standard Grade Biology
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Legobot (talk | contribs) at 22:30, 19 March 2023 (Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (2x)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 22:30, 19 March 2023 by Legobot (talk | contribs) (Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (2x))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:43, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Standard Grade Biology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Also nominating the related articles:
- Standard Grade Chemistry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Standard Grade Physics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Do we need articles on specific high school courses? Surely the article on Standard Grade suffices. Its hard to see how these can ever be more than a course structure and a note on assessment methods. Given that syllabi frequently change, I suggest delete as Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 15:22, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. —Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 15:24, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. -- Iain99Balderdash and piffle 17:00, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all Wikipedia is not the place for course outlines á la indiscriminate collections of information. MvjsTalking 01:34, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Not sure. I'm not sure if this should be deleted or not, but I'm wondering how this compares with the articles in Category:Advanced Placement. Should they be deleted as well? If not, those articles are a bit more developed than the Standard Grade articles, and they could be used as a model if the Standard Grade articles are kept. Just something to think about: I have heard a lot about the AP courses, and in fact I think they are notable (often discussed in the media, for example), but I had never heard about Standard Grade, due to obvious geographic bias on my part. I would like to encourage the delete voters to make sure that their decision is not affected by geographic bias. Maybe (and here I really have no idea) Standard Grade courses are very notable in Scotland and there are sources that could enable one to write a good encyclopedic article about them. --Itub (talk) 06:11, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:39, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as not specifically notable. The AP courses are. DGG (talk) 17:31, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.