Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Robertsky (talk | contribs) at 16:26, 22 March 2023 (Requests to revert undiscussed moves: done 1. song article moved, village discussion opened.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."

  • To list a technical request: edit the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
    {{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
    
    This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
  • If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
  • If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.

Technical requests

Uncontroversial technical requests

  • Cristidiscoidea  Nucleariid (currently a redirect instead to Nucleariida) (move · discuss) – The group of organisms known as "nucleariids" (singular "nucleariid") has received many formal names: first Rotosphaerida, then Nucleariidae/Nucleariida/Nucleariae, then Cristidiscoidea. However, they're all the same, and I believe giving priority to the informal name Nucleariid would relieve us from having to choose one formal taxon name over the other. (Also, I noticed that Nucleariida is also a separate page, and the information there will need to be transferred into Nucleariid just like what happened between Stramenopiles and Heterokont) ☽ Snoteleks13:47, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
From both articles, it looks like Nucleariida is one of two orders in the class Cristidicoidea. Merging the two would mean that the other order does not exist. This doesn't seem right to me. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:49, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Requests to revert undiscussed moves

Contested technical requests

Administrator needed