Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Engineering Music Society
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Legobot (talk | contribs) at 10:27, 24 March 2023 (Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (4x)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 10:27, 24 March 2023 by Legobot (talk | contribs) (Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (4x))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. — Mar. 15, '06 [17:14] <freakofnurxture|talk>
Non notable student society. Red link farm. Delete kingboyk 02:59, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Royboycrashfan 03:01, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable per nom. -- Krash (Talk) 03:14, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete possible A7 speedy. Could warrant a brief mention on the University of Melbourne article. Capitalistroadster 04:33, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 04:33, 9 March 2006 (UTC)"[reply]
- Non-notable. Merge with UOM. -- Ian ≡ talk 04:57, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non notable -- Samir ∙ T C 08:45, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I guess how everyone defines notability is different, but I would consider large student societies to be notable. If it is to be merged anywhere, a UoM Clubs and Societies article would be better than University Of Melbourne, which is cramped enough already. - Synapse 13:06, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Capitalistroadster Computerjoe 20:31, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and cleanup, nothing really wrong with the article, although a lot of irrelevant information is contained within. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 21:07, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wiki is not infinite. Every university and college has a bunch of societies. Wiki is not really the place to detail the history and members of every such small group of people, unless the group is notable in some way. This group do not appear to be interesting - though, bless them, they have kept decent records of their brief and insignificant history. SilkTork 01:30, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge or delete. This can be merged to Melbourne University student unions. A single student group at a single University is rarely independently notable & this is no exception! If not merged, it should be deleted.--Karnesky 06:14, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It still amazes me some of the topics that people think are notable. --Roisterer 02:17, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- To be fair, this is a very old article that has somehow "slipped through the net". Some interesting comments in the edit history I might add :) (example) --kingboyk 02:21, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- While student clubs are not particularly significant or notable in the grand scheme of things, I'd consider articles on them more useful than stuff like January 22 in baseball. Synapse 06:40, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with a Clubs of UoM article. I fully agree with Synapse, and it's a surprisingly good article, but probable vanity. ProhibitOnions 22:39, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.