User talk:CanadianSingh1469/Archives/2022/December
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:CanadianSingh1469. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome!
| Welcome, CanadianSingh1469/Archives/2022! | ||
|---|---|---|
|
August 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Battle of Samana have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Battle of Samana was changed by CanadianSingh1469 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.875756 on 2021-08-25T04:09:51+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:09, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
CanadianSingh1469, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi CanadianSingh1469! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 25 August 2021 (UTC) |
Please stop linking things
Hi - you are linking words that do not need to be linked. Please review WP:OVERLINK. Thanks Girth Summit (blether) 09:31, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:First Battle of Chamkaur
Hello, CanadianSingh1469. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:First Battle of Chamkaur, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
ARBIPA sanctions alert
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Georgethedragonslayer (talk) 05:32, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
Misleading edit summary
Don't revert constructive edits by attacking them as "disruptive" like you did here. Georgethedragonslayer (talk) 05:32, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
It was disruptive because it removed a lot of information without adequate reasoning. This situation should he discussed in the talk page. CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 06:45, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
To add I understand what you mean and I should have worded it better CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 06:50, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
- Can you stop providing wrong details about me to others? I provided adequate edit summaries. USSR provided no support to India that you would mention them in infobox. UK is alleged of providing intelligence by a Sikh group. Still it shouldn't be included in infobox even if it was true. Mention of Israel is based on hearsay. Now you need to stop edit warring or you will be blocked. 103.240.204.243 (talk) 07:19, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
Look you cannot remove sourced information. Bring it to the talk page. CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 20:24, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
- You can remove garbage backed with using poor sources. 103.240.204.243 (talk) 01:35, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Read Wikipedia Content Removal. You need a consensus to removed sourced information. To see of there is a consensus take the situation to the talk page or don’t remove the sourced information. CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 01:37, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
- Are you also going to claim that anybody can insert information like "Khalistan is the best terrorist group" and use one of your fringe Khalistani source, and then you will fight against its removal because "You need a consensus to removed sourced information"? Stop being so dense. 103.240.204.243 (talk) 01:55, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
I didn’t put the information in. It has been around for a long time. Please check your talk page. I am trying to resolve this with evidence. We need to work together. Don’t accuse me of being a Khalistani and don’t call me dense. CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 01:58, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
- Where I said that you are a "khalistani"? Point me out. 103.240.204.243 (talk) 01:59, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
You said, “your fringe Khalistani source.” If I misinterpreted this then I am sorry, Now let’s focus on what matters. CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 02:01, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, I was not calling you Khalistani. Now see the comment I left at Talk:Operation_Blue_Star#American_support_for_Bhindranwale?. 103.240.204.243 (talk) 02:04, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Ok. I have responded CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 02:12, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Reverted Edit to Sikhs Page
Hi there. Do you have a source for the claim that Piara Singh Gill was part of the Manhattan Project? I came to edit it because it was flagged as 'citation needed', but I struggled to find a source, which is why I removed it. Happy to work with you to find a suitable reference. Muriosity (talk) 10:51, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Ok. No problem. Hmm. After doing sole checking I can’t find a direct source for the claim. It comes mostly from “unreliable” sources. CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 17:36, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for following up on this Muriosity (talk) 17:37, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
You have added the term "disputed" in the Jathedar of the Akal Takht article. The Sarbat Khalsa and SGPC have historically been appointing the jathedars of the Akal Takht. Currently imprisoned Jagtar Singh Hawara is the jathedar, while Dhian Singh Mand and Harpreet Singh are acting jathedars. Multiple jathedars at one time is not unprecedented neither, as the 1986 Sarbat Khalsa assigned Jasbir Singh Rode, Gurdev Singh Kaunke, Gurbachan Singh Manochahal and SGPC assigned Prof. Darshan Singh have served as jathedars at the same time. What is the dispute? 1forever&ever (talk) 08:24, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
The dispute who is the real jathedar. CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 15:38, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Jagtar Singh Hawara is the jathedar assigned by the 2015 Sarbat Khalsa.
- Due to the political imprisonment of Hawara, acting jathedars have been assigned by both the Sarbat Khalsa and SGPC, who are referred to as parallel jathedars not "disputed" by sources. [1][2][3] Neither has issued a statement against each other till date, to challenge the legitimacy of the other to raise a "dispute".
- The Sarbat Khalsa has historically overridden decisions taken by organisations and assigned jathedars. For example, British deputy commissioner of Amritsar assigned Sarbrah Arur Singh Naushehra was replaced with Sarbat Khalsa assigns Teja Singh Bhuchar in 1920. SGPC assigned Kirpal Singh was replaced by Sarbat Khalsa assigned Jasbir Singh Rode in 1986. Gurbachan Singh was dismissed Jagtar Singh Hawara assigned by the 2015 Sarbat Khalsa.
- FYI, the 1920 Sarbat Khalsa established the SGPC.[4]
- I am removing "disputed" from the article, if there is still any disagreement, we can consider outside opinion to reach consensus. 1forever&ever (talk) 22:43, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I am having a heavy dispute with an individual who is trying to get the Bhai Jagraj Singh page closed. Obviously via malicious intent. Is there a way you or others can contact admins about this account. Heavily frustrating with this person. Jattlife121 (talk) 16:18, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- Let me know if there is anyway I can help! ThethPunjabi (talk) 04:21, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jagraj Singh Please see if the suitability of the page is fine. I have addressed all points and sources. I personally see no problem with this. Renamed user ds09j342589juvm823r098jae4f (talk) 13:30, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
If they are vandalising report the vandal here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 00:14, 15 December 2022 (UTC)