Jump to content

User talk:Drjmarkov

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Drjmarkov (talk | contribs) at 23:53, 28 March 2023 (Query). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Drjmarkov, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Welcome!

All you'll write, I will read. Thank you

No war. Enjoy time here

Ciao! Sorry for giving you this impression... you work is appreciable and I just used to correct. I was just tired of checking ALL of them for typos and style. And, as you can see, the infobox are left n my new edits. I've added a template in the beginning in this page with all the references for style, article layout and rules, etc. Ciao and good work!!! --Attilios (talk) 12:07, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]




Hi!

About your creation of Mihtarlam, please remember that you always have to put a space after a comma (only in texts, not in numbers). Regards. --Damifb (talk) 19:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your answer. Also, when you have time and if you want to, it would be great if you could track back all the articles where you left that error. Best wishes.

--Damifb (talk) 19:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I already did most of it.--Damifb (talk) 20:32, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sofia and Plovdiv

Please excuse me for my error! Thank you for the correction. Much appreciated. I was merging two articles together, one from Catholic Encyclopedia, and forgot to check whether the vicariate was elevated. Benkenobi18 (talk) 06:50, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks

Thanks for the valuable advice. I being a novice in wikiworld, I am really indebted to you. --omalloor 16:04, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

RfA thanks!


Collecting Materials

Thank you for the valuable suggestions. I am collecting materials for updating the other articles --202.164.134.155 --omalloor 08:03, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invitation. I will do my level best in updating wikiproject: Christianity India omalloor 12:15, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

I think you are also a priest. I can co-operate with the project. But one thing my computer skill is very very little. I am able to do anything with this project provided you guide me. sorry to say that Still I didn't understand the use of templates and all. omalloor 12:55, 21 February 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kuzhinapurath (talkcontribs)

Inviting your comments on the AFD discussion of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fr. Thomas Kuzhinapurath - Tinucherian (talk) 04:49, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have pointed out exactly. The name Thomas Kuzhinapurath is transilitrated from Malayam in worldcat. You can view another work of Thomas Kuzhinapurath namely Salvific Law in worldcat.Achasu (talk) 06:59, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions and suggestions to the article Fr. Thomas Kuzhinapurath. Simon Cheakkanal (talk) 11:28, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am happy to know that you are very much interested indian catholicism. May I have your email. Kuzhinapurath (talk) 02:43, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Your vote

I'm genuinely puzzled by what you say. I have checked everything, and I think you have only contacted me once, about Cardinal Archetti and titular sees. See [1], now at User talk:Charles Matthews/Archive 24. Otherwise - is it possible you are thinking of someone else? At Giovanni Andrea Archetti you undid my edit to links, and that was it. Charles Matthews (talk) 10:57, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization

Hi -- I'm sorting through a lot of the Afghanistan stubs you created (wow! must have taken you ages -- I'm glad someone took the time to do it), and I wanted to let you know about some capitalization rules in English. In most cases, "north," "south," "east," and "west" are not capitalized. Also, if you write two direction words together, they are usually written as one word - "northeast" and not "north-east." I'll take care of the Afghanistan ones as I sort, but I thought you'd like to know for the future. Keep up the good work! Aelfthrytha (talk) 06:54, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about it too much -- we all make mistakes in non-native languages. If you have any uncertainty in the future, though, please feel free to ask me. I am a native speaker, and I would be happy to assist you with anything related to English (or anything else, for that matter). Cheers! Aelfthrytha (talk) 20:41, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it Khost (Matun)? Are they synonyms or is Matun within Khost? Kingturtle (talk) 18:54, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My talk page...

Stop threatening that "administration" (????) will be on to me (your threats won't influence me). Stop your borderline personal attacks. Stop telling me what to do. If you want to continue the issue, use the correct channels that I have suggested to you - not my talk page. Good day. --Merbabu (talk) 00:00, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Baldevo, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rhodope and Ottoman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 08 July 2015

The Signpost: 15 July 2015

The Signpost: 22 July 2015

The Signpost: 29 July 2015

The Signpost: 05 August 2015

The Signpost: 12 August 2015

The Signpost: 19 August 2015

The Signpost: 26 August 2015

The Signpost: 02 September 2015

The Signpost: 09 September 2015

The Signpost: 16 September 2015

The Signpost: 23 September 2015

The Signpost: 30 September 2015

The Signpost: 07 October 2015

The Signpost: 14 October 2015

The Signpost: 21 October 2015

The Signpost: 28 October 2015

The Signpost: 04 November 2015

File permission problem with File:Khanabad.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Khanabad.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 04:06, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 11 November 2015

The Signpost: 18 November 2015

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 November 2015

The Signpost: 02 December 2015

The Signpost: 09 December 2015

The Signpost: 16 December 2015

The Signpost: 30 December 2015

The Signpost: 06 January 2016

The Signpost: 13 January 2016

The Signpost: 20 January 2016

The Signpost: 27 January 2016

Catholic-Hierarchy.org

Hello. I noticed that you have edited a number of articles on Catholicism. A discussion is taking place as to whether the website Catholic-Hierarchy.org is a reliable source that can be utilized on Wikipedia or whether all references and information derived from it should be deleted. This topic is currently being discussed at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard [2]. As the website's removal as a reference will affect several thousand Wikipedia articles, I believe that the broadest range of opinions should be obtained before action is taken. Please contribute if interested.Patapsco913 (talk) 22:07, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 03 February 2016

The Signpost: 10 February 2016

The Signpost: 17 February 2016

The Signpost: 24 February 2016

The Signpost: 02 March 2016

The Signpost: 09 March 2016

The Signpost: 16 March 2016

The Signpost: 23 March 2016

The Signpost: 1 April 2016

The Signpost: 14 April 2016

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Balgarchevo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BSP. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 April 2016

The Signpost: 2 May 2016

The Signpost: 17 May 2016

The Signpost: 28 May 2016

The Signpost: 05 June 2016

The Signpost: 15 June 2016

The Signpost: 04 July 2016

The Signpost: 21 July 2016

The Signpost: 04 August 2016

The Signpost: 18 August 2016

The Signpost: 06 September 2016

The Signpost: 29 September 2016

The Signpost: 14 October 2016

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 01:54, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Drjmarkov. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

The Signpost: 22 December 2016

The Signpost: 17 January 2017

The Signpost: 6 February 2017

The Signpost: 27 February 2017

The Signpost: 9 June 2017

The Signpost: 23 June 2017

The Signpost: 15 July 2017

The Signpost: 5 August 2017

The Signpost: 6 September 2017

The Signpost: 25 September 2017

The Signpost: 23 October 2017

The Signpost: 24 November 2017

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Drjmarkov. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 December 2017

Soviet aviation Task Force

Hi! I've noticed your contributions to creating articles on Soviet aviation and was wondering if you would consider joining the Soviet Avition Task Force (still a work in progress right now) one it is established?--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:21, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 January 2018

The Signpost: 5 February 2018

The Signpost: 20 February 2018

Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018

The Signpost: 26 April 2018

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

The Signpost: 29 June 2018

The Signpost: 31 July 2018

The Signpost: 30 August 2018

The Signpost: 1 October 2018

The Signpost: 28 October 2018

The Signpost: 1 December 2018

The Signpost: 24 December 2018

The Signpost: 31 January 2019

The Signpost: 28 February 2019

The Signpost: 31 March 2019

The Signpost: 30 April 2019

The Signpost: 31 May 2019

The June 2019 Signpost is out!

The Signpost: 31 July 2019

The Signpost: 30 August 2019

The Signpost: 30 September 2019

The Signpost: 31 October 2019

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 November 2019

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gaytaninovo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Melnik (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 December 2019

The Signpost: 27 January 2020

The Signpost: 1 March 2020

The Signpost: 29 March 2020

The Signpost: 26 April 2020

The Signpost: 31 May 2020

The Signpost: 28 June 2020

The Signpost: 2 August 2020

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paril, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Slavyanka and Ottoman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Petrelik, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slavyanka.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 August 2020

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

The Signpost: 1 November 2020

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 November 2020

The Signpost: 28 December 2020

The Signpost: 31 January 2021

The Signpost: 28 February 2021

The Signpost: 28 March 2021

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

The Signpost: 27 June 2021

The Signpost: 25 July 2021

The Signpost: 29 August 2021

The Signpost: 26 September 2021

The Signpost: 31 October 2021

The Signpost: 29 November 2021

The Signpost: 28 December 2021

The WikiEagle - January 2022

The WikiEagle
The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter
Volume I — Issue 1
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Announcements
  • After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name The WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its sub-projects. If you wish to continue receiving The WikiEagle, you can add your username to the mailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please let us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged.
  • On 16 December, an RfC was closed which determined theaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which is cited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue.
  • Luft46.com has been added to the list of problematic sources after this discussion.
  • The Jim Lovell article was promoted to Featured Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Hawkeye7.
  • The Raymond Hesselyn article was promoted to Good Article status on 4 December after being nominated by Zawed.
  • The Supermarine Sea King article was promoted to Good Article status on 22 December after being nominated by Amitchell125.
  • The William Hodgson (RAF officer) article was promoted to Good Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Zawed.
Members

New Members

Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921.

Closed Discussions


Featured Article assessment

Good Article assessment

Deletion

Requested moves

Article Statistics
This data reflects values from DMY.
New/Ongoing Discussions

On The Main Page


Did you know...

Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list.
Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 January 2022

The Signpost: 27 February 2022

Nomination of Zaim Chiflik for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zaim Chiflik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zaim Chiflik until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 17:36, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 March 2022

The Signpost: 24 April 2022

The Signpost: 29 May 2022

The Signpost: 26 June 2022

The Signpost: 1 August 2022

The Signpost: 31 August 2022

The Signpost: 30 September 2022

The Signpost: 31 October 2022

The Signpost: 28 November 2022

The Signpost: 1 January 2023

The Signpost: 16 January 2023

The Signpost: 4 February 2023

The Signpost: 20 February 2023

The Signpost: 9 March 2023

The Signpost: 20 March 2023

Nomination of Bryan White (motivational speaker) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bryan White (motivational speaker) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryan White (motivational speaker) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 15:43, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Query

Hello Drjmarkov. I'm Blablubbs, and I'm an administrator here. I am reaching out to ask whether you have any connection to Bryan White (motivational speaker). Specifically, I am wondering whether you have any relationship with White that could constitute a conflict of interest. Please do not edit further before you answer this message. Thank you. --Blablubbs (talk) 17:10, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am a Bulgarian, living in Bulgaria. I never met him. I don't have relationship with him. I came upon his story from a friend of mine. It looked prety impressive to me. You are very biased when appears an article about some person from Africa and it always looks suspicious. After that there were shown materials throwing a shade over his work. I contacted my friend and asked him about the whole story and he told me about some extortion and stuff like that, trying to frame him, but he went clear out of it. This may sound stupid, but I think people like him deserve the world to know about them. If you decide to delete the article it will not be a great tragedy. People, who have done literally notning useful in their life may be mentioned here just because they are lame soccer players for example. I know the rules of Wikipedia prety well and they are allowing articles to exist for people, who have never done anything useful for anybody, but they are dead. But when appears an article for young living person, who is not a soccer player or celebrity, then a big peoblem rises. I think in that situation we should leave to some Ugandan user to say their opinion and avoid taking fast decisions. I don't know much about Uganda, but do you? Drjmarkov (talk) 23:50, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]