Jump to content

Talk:WWE Breaking Point

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 11:57, 7 April 2023 (Reminder of an inactive anchor: disqualified). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Submission PPV

Shouldnt we put that all the matches will be Submission based?LifeStroke420 (talk) 18:25, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's already mentioned (first line of the Background section). TJ Spyke 18:27, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My bad lolLifeStroke420 (talk) 18:31, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On the one hand I heard on smackdown it was an all-submission PPV, but later in the show they said the main events were submission. I'm confused. Does anyone know which it is? Freebird (talk) 01:53, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Only some of the matches are, not all. TJ Spyke 03:37, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WWE Magazine

The current issue of WWE Magazine seems to indicate that Breaking Point will be an all new event with its own lineage and not a continuation of Unforgiven. "This September WWE debuts its all-submission pay-per-view Breaking Point..." Wwehurricane1 (talk) 01:31, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible for you to add the citation here to the talk page or in the article using the appropriate citation templates? Thanks.--Truco 503 01:53, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
WWE Magazine, August {{citation}}: Check date values in: |date= and |year= / |date= mismatch (help)

Don't have the magazine in front of me for the page number and WWE Magazine doesn't list the author of the individual articles. I'll get the page number to you tomorrow when I get home (I'm at work now).Wwehurricane1 (talk) 02:04, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cite journal would be more accurate than the generic Template:Citation. TJ Spyke 02:42, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rey Mysterio

Rey Mysterio has been busted for being a roid freak, and will be suspended effective 2 September 2009. It is therefore most certain that there will NOT be a Mysterio-Ziggler Intercontinental Championship Match at Breaking Point.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.245.171.61 (talk) 07:29, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We don't know that. No telling when his suspension starts or what WWE will do.--WillC 21:25, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Supension I think starts now or maybe after Breaking Point.Which means Dolph Ziggler will probaly become the IC Champion. (talk)

WWE.com specifically said the suspension starts on September 2. http://www.wwe.com/inside/news/869043 The match at Breaking Point almost certainly will not happen. Wwehurricane1 (talk) 22:22, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
To the IP, you do realize that the Wellness Policy covers more than just steroids? You don't know what he did to violate it. Yes we know the match will not happen, but as of right now the match is still official (they had no choice since they had already taped the #1 contenders match on Superstars the day before announcing the suspension). TJ Spyke 01:58, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Rey Mysterio shouldn't be listed in the match, it should say Dolph Ziggler vs TBD or just be removed all together. WWE publicly announced that he is suspended as of September 2nd, therefore he is in no way able to compete at Breaking Point, therefore there is no way Rey vs Dolph will happen. 71.185.49.253 (talk) 15:34, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That would be OR. The match is official as of August 29 and will stay there until WWE changes it. TJ Spyke 16:05, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
How the hell would it be original research? WWE.com state that Rey will be on suspension when Breaking Point happens. 81.103.175.183 (talk) 16:38, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You don't know what will happen with the match, so it's speculation. The match is still on. Also, don't vandalize by altering other peoples comments. TJ Spyke 16:50, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the IP that the match won't happen, BUT I'm going to have to side with TJ on this one if for no other reason than the fact that Wikipedia doesn't allow spoilers.Wwehurricane1 (talk) 23:12, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's not even about spoilers, literally nothing is known at this point. WWE could change the match, postpone it, cancel it, change their mind about the suspension, etc. 99.9% chance the match won't happen, but anything specific would just be speculation. TJ Spyke 00:11, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's not a spoiler if WWE.com confirmed the fact that Rey is suspended as of September 2nd, therefore there is no possible way that the match can happen, the match should be removed from the listing since there is no way at all that the match can or will occur. 71.185.49.253 (talk) 03:46, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That would be vandalism, plain and simple. WWE themselves added the match to their site the day AFTER announcing the suspension. The match won't likely happen, but as of right now it IS official. It will NOT be removed until WWE changes it, any edit that removes it otherwise will be reverted as vandalism and the user warned. TJ Spyke 03:49, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Just speculation here, but because Mysterio's suspension is being held off until September 2nd, Ziggler/Mysterio will probably happen at the next Smackdown taping, on Sept. 2nd, with Mysterio's suspension coming into effect immediately following his loss to Ziggler.99.254.104.18 (talk) 01:59, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding a point mentioned earlier. The claim that Wikipedia does not allow spoilers is simply false In fact the spoiler guideline Wikipedia:Spoiler states the complete opposite. Granted it does not apply to this case but I thought it needed to be clearified.--76.69.171.178 (talk) 04:43, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Ross has confirmed that the match will NOT take place. The article has been updated accordingly. http://www.jrsbarbq.com/blog/jrs-weekend-updatejeff-hardy-thoughtsreynew-ventures-jr Wwehurricane1 (talk) 19:42, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SPOILER ALERT "'Appens that Johnny Marleyson beat Ray Mosquito for the Ic Title at Smackdown tapings, so Breaking Point will pobably be Marleyson vs Diggler for title. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.245.147.162 (talk) 06:51, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So? This is not for speculation. TJ Spyke 16:01, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Morrison is the IC Champion. Ziggler won a title shot at the PPV. It's COMMON SENSE not "speculation". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.245.147.162 (talk) 07:03, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is speculation it will be at this PPV still or that it will be at a PPV anyway now that there is a new champion.--WillC 08:39, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That is silly. You could say it is speculation that Orton will be there, as his car could crash tomorrow. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.245.147.162 (talk) 17:02, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No it's not silly. Orton has been announced to be in a match at the PPV. Morrison has not, neither has Ziggler. It would be nothing but speculation to say they will ever wrestle each other, yet alone that it will be at Breaking Point. TJ Spyke 19:15, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, I can't believe you just said that. Look, you can't add something that is speculative PERIOD. Okay, and if his car crashes, and we find a reliable source to back it up, then it MAY be added to the article, or perhaps Orton's article. --Lord Dagon (talk) 19:17, 3 September 2009 (UTC) PS - I didn't say that to TJ, I meant to say it to the guy with the car crash theory.--Lord Dagon (talk) 19:20, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, who would have thunk? The article now states that it will in fact be Morrison vs Ziggler for the IC Title after all. Hmmmm, funny that. 41.245.136.168 (talk) 07:34, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Funny that you managed to grow up without hurting yourself. TJ Spyke 17:26, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
^TJ SPYKE you just attacked another person with an insult, please do not do that, you were wronga nd he was right —Preceding unsigned comment added by Punisher88 (talk • contribs) 06:20, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just a little note. Those who kept trying to get Morrison vs. Ziggler approved for the article saying its common sense that the match will happen, well, it's been canceled. You COULD say it's "speculation" after all, but I'm not here to be immature. The match being canceled is a good example of how articles should be constructed. First, it was a totally different bout, then it was taken off, re-instated with a different competitor, and now taken off. Of course, it was all CITED correctly, not just following rumors or spoilers, so there's nothing wrong with that. Do you get how it works?--Lord Dagon (talk) 03:54, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think everyone did BEFORE you just made that rant... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.245.159.97 (talk) 12:59, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you all delete this?

I added after Dolph Zigler's match.. "Dolph Ziggler w. Maria" .. Shouldn't she be listed, shes going to manage him.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.74.109.91 (talk) 13:18, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a source that she will be at ringside for him? Otherwise that violates WP:OR. This was pointed out on your talkpage. TJ Spyke 15:10, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mention of original match

Just need an answer for this question, so here goes. Originally, it was announced that Mysterio would face Ziggler with the Intercontinental title on the line, but now it has been cancelled. Will the article have any mention whatsoever of the original match? And no, I'm not suggesting Morrison vs. Ziggler, just saying so nobody thinks I am. I am just curious as to the mention of the original match.--Lord Dagon (talk) 02:41, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Once wwe.com officially removes the match, I don't see why not. TJ Spyke 02:50, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm just sayin', but it will be Morrison vs Ziggler (Jim Ross stated that the winner of Mysterio and Morrison would face him and ecen showed Ziggler watching the match) mention the origional match, though. MC Steel (talk) 06:45, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When does it air in Australia?--Lord Dagon (talk) 15:30, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think it already has. I think it airs at 3PM in Australia, which is like 2AM here, so it's already aired. TJ Spyke 15:32, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And if I am not mistaken, once it airs in Australia, updates concerning fore-coming PPV events can be posted, right?--Lord Dagon (talk) 20:46, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sir. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:47, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Going back to the original question, I think the background section should mention the Dolph/Rey feud. Not only was this part of the original build up for the PPV, also it should be mentioned how Morrison won the title, as it is part of the build up and so close to it. Tony2Times (talk) 20:56, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking the same thing.--Lord Dagon (talk) 21:10, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Tony. That is what I am doing with Genesis 2009 with the three changes to the original card that happened at the event. It is apart of the build-up.--WillC 13:32, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Citation

I added the ECW title match, but I don't know how to cite it. It's from wwe.com if someone can take care of it. Freebird (talk) 01:44, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You could have just copied one of the existing matches and just changed it to the correct info. I've fixed it. TJ Spyke 02:14, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh ok. I'll remember next time. Thanks TJ. Freebird (talk) 01:50, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WWE Intercontinental Championship Match

Has been canceled. WWE.com took it off it's Breaking Point page. The citation was a dead link so I fixed it. Letting you all know.--Lord Dagon (talk) 03:38, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So what if the match link was taken down? That's been done before, there is no source the match is canceled. I am about to log off, but tomorrow I will add the match back in and cite last weeks SmackDown when they announced the match. Removing it will be vandalism if there i no source for the match being canceled. TJ Spyke 05:01, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, sorry.--Lord Dagon (talk) 15:43, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Appears valid per an update on Jim Ross' blog.
"It looks as if the pending John Morrison vs. Dolph Ziggler IC Title bout will take place after Sunday's PPV at some point TBD. I have high expectations for this rivalry and feel that these two men can have a heck of a series going forward."
No mention of the match - cancellation or no - on the WWE or Breaking Point site as far as I can see. Card is subject to change though, so it'd prolly behoove everyone to wait on changes for Friday's show. Papacha (talk) 11:02, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
My guess is that they will indeed remove it. Without giving too much away (I have read the spoiler reports), but Ziggler said he will take his title shot when he wants too. 17:32, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
If the match is taken off the WWE website, therefore the match is no longer official, therefore having the match on the site would be "speculation" as you said, it is no longer confirmed on the site, therefore should not be mentioned on wikipedia. WWE.com is the official website of the World Wrestling Entertainment company and if they do no mention the match, then it isn't confirmed for the PPV, then it has no place to be on here as a confirmed match. 71.185.49.253 (talk) 04:32, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.wrestleview.com/news2009/1252609513.php?style=dark But from the looks of it the match will NOT happen at the PPV but at a later time.The match aint cancel but moved.I say leave it as the match not happening for right now,this is wwe and it could change the day of the PPV for all we know.--Forrestdfuller (talk) 17:55, 10 September 2009 (EST)

Chris Jerhicho and Big Show b Mark Henary and MVP To retain the tag titles —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.168.234.107 (talk) 00:23, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

I didn't want to put it in myself because I wouldn't know exactly what to point out as notable in the criticism of the event as said by the critics, so I have to ask...is someone going to add the reception section to this article?--Lord Dagon (talk) 20:14, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on WWE Breaking Point. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:52, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:WWE_Breaking_Point&oldid=1148639165"