Talk:My Man Godfrey
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Untitled
I know that Leonard Maltin's annual quick reference compendium on movies says that in the party scene, the young woman standing by the piano is Jane Wyman, but, I can't agree. I've watched that scene over and over, and, in my opinion, the young woman is Jane Wyatt. I've recently seen "Lost Horizon" (1937), which convinced me that the woman in My Man Godfrey is Jane Wyatt. It's quite possible, given that first six letters of both women's names are J-a-n-e W-y, that the name was erroneously transcribed from a source document. Dli04b (talk) 20:07, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
PD status
This film is claiming PD status from this source which also states "but remember the underlying works may still be copyrighted". The movie is based on the 1935 book 1101 Park Avenue by Eric S. Hatch. The book was retitled My Man Godfry with the film's release. The copyright was renewed in 1963. Therefore the book the film is based on is still in copyright. This is an example of a "Multilayered Work", as described at the Stanford Public Domain Troublespots. And according to this: "Films are often based on books, plays, or other works that may maintain copyright. If the pre-existing work is protected, than rightly or wrongly, it has generally been determined that the derived film is also protected." As such the claim of PD needs to be clarified since it would probably not hold up in court should the rights holder (Eric Hatch estate) ever challenge it. -- GreenC 16:01, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:22, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:08, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Similar plots
Having just watched Brian Aherne in "Merrily We Live" also portraying a middle or upperclass man cast in the role of a servant, but whose obvious class background is unnoticed by the screwy family. Both are comedies with a social twist. Perhaps in the 1930s depression this rang bells for the audience. And in both cases the daughters of the family compete over the affections of the man. 77.100.178.145 (talk) 13:28, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Start-Class film articles
- Start-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Unknown-importance American cinema articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class Library of Congress articles
- Low-importance Library of Congress articles
- WikiProject Library of Congress articles
- Start-Class Comedy articles
- High-importance Comedy articles
- WikiProject Comedy articles